The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of an Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist, Bosentan, on Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Endothelin is a powerful vasoconstrictor peptide derived from the endothelium. We evaluated the contribution of endothelin to blood-pressure regulation in patients with essential hypertension by studying the effect of an endothelin-receptor antagonist, bosentan. METHODS: We studied 293 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a placebo run-in period of four to six weeks, patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four oral doses of bosentan (100, 500, or 1000 mg once daily or 1000 mg twice daily), placebo, or the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor enalapril (20 mg once daily) for four weeks. Blood pressure was measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, bosentan resulted in a significant reduction in diastolic pressure with a daily dose of 500 or 2000 mg (an absolute reduction of 5.7 mm Hg at each dose), which was similar to the reduction with enalapril (5.8 mm Hg). There were no significant changes in heart rate. Bosentan did not result in activation of the sympathetic nervous system (as determined by measurement of the plasma norepinephrine level) or the renin-angiotensin system (as determined by measurements of plasma renin activity and angiotensin II levels). CONCLUSIONS: An endothelin-receptor antagonist, bosentan, significantly lowered blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension, suggesting that endothelin may contribute to elevated blood pressure in such patients. The favorable effect of treatment with bosentan on blood pressure occurred without reflexive neurohormonal activation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease - a 30th anniversary update
Vanhoutte, P. M., Shimokawa, H., Feletou, M., & Tang, E. H. C. (2017) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12646 · Cited by 937
Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture)
Félétou, M., & Vanhoutte, P. M. (2006) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00292.2006 · Cited by 818
Davenport, A. P., Hyndman, K. A., Dhaun, N., Southan, C., Kohan, D. E., Pollock, J. S., Pollock, D. M., Webb, D. J., & Maguire, J. J. (2016) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.115.011833 · Cited by 772
Endothelial Dysfunction and Hypertension
Konukoglu, D., & Uzun, H. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/5584_2016_90 · Cited by 594
Fattinger, K. (2001) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.114667 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Krum, H., Viskoper, R. J., Lacourciere, Y., Budde, M., & Charlon, V.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-03-19
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 784-791
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336346210
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of an Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist, Bosentan, on Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199803193381202
- The paper
- Krum, H., Viskoper, R. J., Lacourciere, Y., Budde, M., & Charlon, V. (1998). The Effect of an Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist, Bosentan, on Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199803193381202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.