Cited by 1,930Erythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementBlood transfusion and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Normal as Compared with Low Hematocrit Values in Patients with Cardiac Disease Who Are Receiving Hemodialysis and Epoetin

Open access
Besarab, Anatole, Bolton, W. Kline, Browne, Jeffrey K., Egrie, Joan C., Nissenson, Allen R., Okamoto, Douglas M., Schwab, Steve J., Goodkin, David A.·1998·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BackgroundIn patients with end-stage renal dis- ease, anemia develops as a result of erythropoietin deficiency, and recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is prescribed to correct the anemia partially.We examined the risks and benefits of normalizing the hematocrit in patients with cardiac disease who were undergoing hemodialysis. MethodsWe studied 1233 patients with clinical ev- idence of congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who were undergoing hemodialysis: 618 patients were assigned to receive increasing doses of epoetin to achieve and maintain a hematocrit of 42 percent, and 615 were assigned to receive doses of epoetin sufficient to maintain a hematocrit of 30 percent throughout the study.The median duration of treatment was 14 months.The primary end point was the length of time to death or a first nonfatal myocardial infarction. ResultsAfter 29 months, there were 183 deaths and 19 first nonfatal myocardial infarctions among the patients in the normal-hematocrit group and 150 deaths and 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions among those in the low-hematocrit group (risk ratio for the normal-hematocrit group as compared with the lowhematocrit group, 1.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 1.9).Although the difference in event-free survival between the two groups did not reach the prespecified statistical stopping boundary, the study was halted.The causes of death in the two groups were similar.The mortality rates decreased with increasing hematocrit values in both groups.The patients in the normal-hematocrit group had a decline in the adequacy of dialysis and received intravenous iron dextran more often than those in the low-hematocrit group. ConclusionsIn patients with clinically evident congestive heart failure or ischemic heart disease who are receiving hemodialysis, administration of epoetin to raise their hematocrit to 42 percent is not recommended.(N

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199808273390903

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Pascual J, 1991, Clin Nephrol, 35, 280
  2. Eschbach JW, 1993, J Am Soc Nephrol, 4, 425
  3. Collins A, 1994, J Am Soc Nephrol, 5, 439
  4. Nissenson AR, 1996, J Am Soc Nephrol, 7, 1459
  5. Barany P, 1996, J Am Soc Nephrol, 7, 1472
  6. Benz RL, 1996, J Am Soc Nephrol, 7, 1473
  7. Hoen B, 1995, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 10, 377
  8. Collins A, 1997, J Am Soc Nephrol, 8, 190A

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Besarab, A., Bolton, W. K., Browne, J. K., Egrie, J. C., Nissenson, A. R., Okamoto, D. M., Schwab, S. J., & Goodkin, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1998-08-27
Volume
339
Issue
9
Pages
584-590
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2331665138
Cited by
1,930
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 99
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood transfusion and management
Keywords
hematocrit, recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin, hemodialysis, end-stage renal disease, anemia, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, mortality, dialysis adequacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review