Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medical Management of Glaucoma

Alward, Wallace L.M.·1998·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. It is estimated that by the year 2000, 66.8 million people will be affected, of whom 6.7 million will be blind in both eyes.1 Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy in which the axons of the optic nerve die and the plates of lamina cribrosa collapse, leading to loss of optic-nerve tissue and excavation, or “cupping,” of the ophthalmoscopically visible optic-nerve head. When sufficient axonal loss occurs, peripheral vision declines; loss of central vision occurs much later. Most forms of glaucoma are painless, and the loss of vision is insidious. . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199810293391808

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Alward, W. L. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1998-10-29
Volume
339
Issue
18
Pages
1298-1307
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2336197566
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Management of Glaucoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199810293391808
The paper
Alward, W. L. M. (1998). Medical Management of Glaucoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199810293391808

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.