Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 725

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma

Lo, Y.M. Dennis, Hjelm, N. Magnus, Fidler, Carrie, Sargent, Ian L., Murphy, Michael F., Chamberlain, Paul F., Poon, Priscilla M.K., Redman, Christopher W.G., Wainscoat, James S.·1998·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to determine fetal RhD Status noninvasively is useful in the treatment of RhD-sensitized pregnant women whose partners are heterozygous for the RhD gene. The recent demonstration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma raises the possibility that fetal RhD genotyping may be possible with the use of maternal plasma. METHODS: We studied 57 RhD-negative pregnant women and their singleton fetuses. DNA extracted from maternal plasma was analyzed for the RhD gene with a fluorescence-based polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) test sensitive enough to detect the RhD gene in a single cell. Fetal RhD status was determined directly by serologic analysis of cord blood or PCR analysis of amniotic fluid. RESULTS: Among the 57 RhD-negative women, 12 were in their first trimester of pregnancy, 30 were in their second trimester, and 15 were in their third trimester. Thirty-nine fetuses were RhD-positive, and 18 were RhD-negative. In the samples obtained from women in their second or third trimester of pregnancy, the results of RhD PCR analysis of maternal plasma DNA were completely concordant with the results of serologic analysis. Among the maternal plasma samples collected in the first trimester, 2 contained no RhD DNA, but the fetuses were RhD-positive; the results in the other 10 samples were concordant (7 were RhD-positive, and 3 RhD-negative). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping can be performed rapidly and reliably with the use of maternal plasma beginning in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199812103392402

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 725

Metadata

Authors
Lo, Y. M. D., Hjelm, N. M., Fidler, C., Sargent, I. L., Murphy, M. F., Chamberlain, P. F., Poon, P. M. K., Redman, C. W. G., & Wainscoat, J. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1998-12-10
Volume
339
Issue
24
Pages
1734-1738
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2314340472
Cited by
725
References
1
FWCI
27.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199812103392402
The paper
Lo, Y. M. D., Hjelm, N. M., Fidler, C., Sargent, I. L., Murphy, M. F., Chamberlain, P. F., Poon, P. M. K., Redman, C. W. G., & Wainscoat, J. S. (1998). Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199812103392402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.