The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to determine fetal RhD Status noninvasively is useful in the treatment of RhD-sensitized pregnant women whose partners are heterozygous for the RhD gene. The recent demonstration of fetal DNA in maternal plasma raises the possibility that fetal RhD genotyping may be possible with the use of maternal plasma. METHODS: We studied 57 RhD-negative pregnant women and their singleton fetuses. DNA extracted from maternal plasma was analyzed for the RhD gene with a fluorescence-based polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) test sensitive enough to detect the RhD gene in a single cell. Fetal RhD status was determined directly by serologic analysis of cord blood or PCR analysis of amniotic fluid. RESULTS: Among the 57 RhD-negative women, 12 were in their first trimester of pregnancy, 30 were in their second trimester, and 15 were in their third trimester. Thirty-nine fetuses were RhD-positive, and 18 were RhD-negative. In the samples obtained from women in their second or third trimester of pregnancy, the results of RhD PCR analysis of maternal plasma DNA were completely concordant with the results of serologic analysis. Among the maternal plasma samples collected in the first trimester, 2 contained no RhD DNA, but the fetuses were RhD-positive; the results in the other 10 samples were concordant (7 were RhD-positive, and 3 RhD-negative). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive fetal RhD genotyping can be performed rapidly and reliably with the use of maternal plasma beginning in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum
Bianchi, D. W., Zickwolf, G. K., Weil, G. J., Sylvester, S., & DeMaria, M. A. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.705 · Cited by 1,264
Cited by
Liquid Biopsies: Genotyping Circulating Tumor DNA
Diaz, L. A., & Bardelli, A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.45.2011 · Cited by 2,210
Chiu, R. W. K., Akolekar, R., Zheng, Y. W. L., Leung, T. Y., Sun, H., Chan, K. C. A., Lun, F. M. F., Go, A. T. J. I., Lau, E. T., To, W. W. K., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c7401 · Cited by 774
Self-citationThe use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
Wright, C. F., & Burton, H. (2008) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn047 · Cited by 257
Non-invasive prenatal determination of fetal sex: translating research into clinical practice
Hill, M., Finning, K., Martin, P., Hogg, J., Meaney, C., Norbury, G., Daniels, G., & Chitty, L. (2011) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01533.x · Cited by 168
Fetal DNA in maternal plasma: biology and diagnostic applications
Lo, Y. M. D. (2000) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/46.12.1903 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lo, Y. M. D., Hjelm, N. M., Fidler, C., Sargent, I. L., Murphy, M. F., Chamberlain, P. F., Poon, P. M. K., Redman, C. W. G., & Wainscoat, J. S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-12-10
- Volume
- 339
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1734-1738
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2314340472
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199812103392402
- The paper
- Lo, Y. M. D., Hjelm, N. M., Fidler, C., Sargent, I. L., Murphy, M. F., Chamberlain, P. F., Poon, P. M. K., Redman, C. W. G., & Wainscoat, J. S. (1998). Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal RhD Status by Molecular Analysis of Maternal Plasma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199812103392402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.