The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon — The First Year's Experience
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: On October 27, 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide. We collected data on all terminally ill Oregon residents who received prescriptions for lethal medications under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act and who died in 1998. The data were obtained from physicians' reports, death certificates, and interviews with physicians. We compared persons who took lethal medications prescribed under the act with those who died from similar illnesses but did not receive prescriptions for lethal medications. RESULTS: Information on 23 persons who received prescriptions for lethal medications was reported to the Oregon Health Division; 15 died after taking the lethal medications, 6 died from underlying illnesses, and 2 were alive as of January 1, 1999. The median age of the 15 patients who died after taking lethal medications was 69 years; 8 were male, and all 15 were white. Thirteen of the 15 patients had cancer. The case patients and controls were similar with regard to sex, race, urban or rural residence, level of education, health insurance coverage, and hospice enrollment. No case patients or controls expressed concern about the financial impact of their illness. One case patient and 15 controls expressed concern about inadequate control of pain (P=0.10). The case patients were more likely than the controls to have never married (P=0.04) and were more likely to be concerned about loss of autonomy due to illness (P=0.01) and loss of control of bodily functions (P=0.02). At death, 21 percent of the case patients and 84 percent of the controls were completely disabled (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the first year of legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, the decision to request and use a prescription for lethal medication was associated with concern about loss of autonomy or control of bodily functions, not with fear of intractable pain or concern about financial loss. In addition, we found that the choice of physician-assisted suicide was not associated with level of education or health insurance coverage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation
Keown, J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511495335 · Cited by 258
Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome
Lulé, D., Zickler, C., Häcker, S., Bruno, M. A., Demertzi, A., Pellas, F., Laureys, S., & Kübler, A. (2009) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17723-3 · Cited by 217
Steck, N., Egger, M., Maessen, M., Reisch, T., & Zwahlen, M. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a0f427 · Cited by 179
Rietjens, J. A. C., van der Maas, P. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., van Delden, J. J. M., & van der Heide, A. (2009) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-009-9172-3 · Cited by 138
Dees, M., Vernooij‐Dassen, M., Dekkers, W., & van Weel, C. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1612 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin, A. E., Hedberg, K., Higginson, G. K., & Fleming, D. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-02-18
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 577-583
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1988752867
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon — The First Year's Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199902183400724
- The paper
- Chin, A. E., Hedberg, K., Higginson, G. K., & Fleming, D. W. (1999). Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon — The First Year's Experience. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199902183400724
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.