Cited by 180Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Selected European Countries and US States: Systematic Literature Review

Steck, Nicole, Egger, Matthias, Maessen, Maud, Reisch, Thomas, Zwahlen, Marcel·2013·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Legal in some European countries and US states, physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia remain under debate in these and other countries. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine numbers, characteristics, and trends over time for assisted dying in regions where these practices are legal: Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Oregon, Washington, and Montana. DESIGN: This was a systematic review of journal articles and official reports. Medline and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies, from inception to end of 2012. We searched the websites of the health authorities of all eligible countries and states for reports on physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia and included publications that reported on cases of physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. We extracted information on the total number of assisted deaths, its proportion in relation to all deaths, and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals assisted to die. RESULTS: A total of 1043 publications were identified; 25 articles and reports were retained, including series of reported cases, physician surveys, and reviews of death certificates. The percentage of physician-assisted deaths among all deaths ranged from 0.1%-0.2% in the US states and Luxembourg to 1.8%-2.9% in the Netherlands. Percentages of cases reported to the authorities increased in most countries over time. The typical person who died with assistance was a well-educated male cancer patient, aged 60-85 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some common characteristics between countries, we found wide variation in the extent and specific characteristics of those who died an assisted death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182a0f427

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steck, N., Egger, M., Maessen, M., Reisch, T., & Zwahlen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Steck, Nicole
  • Egger, Matthias
  • Maessen, Maud
  • Zwahlen, Marcel
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2013-10
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
938-944
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089772451
Cited by
179
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, assisted dying, cancer patients, Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Switzerland, Oregon, Washington, Montana, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Belgium, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Luxembourg, Male, Middle Aged, Montana, Netherlands, Oregon, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Switzerland, Washington, Suicide, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review