The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of the Interval between Pregnancies on Perinatal Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A short interval between pregnancies has been associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Whether that association is due to confounding by other risk factors, such as maternal age, socioeconomic status, and reproductive history, is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the interpregnancy interval in relation to low birth weight, preterm birth, and small size for gestational age by analyzing data from the birth certificates of 173,205 singleton infants born alive to multiparous mothers in Utah from 1989 to 1996. RESULTS: Infants conceived 18 to 23 months after a previous live birth had the lowest risks of adverse perinatal outcomes; shorter and longer interpregnancy intervals were associated with higher risks. These associations persisted when the data were stratified according to and controlled for 16 biologic, sociodemographic, and behavioral risk factors. As compared with infants conceived 18 to 23 months after a live birth, infants conceived less than 6 months after a live birth had odds ratios of 1.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.6) for low birth weight, 1.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.5) for preterm birth, and 1.3 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.4) for small size for gestational age; infants conceived 120 months or more after a live birth had odds ratios of 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 2.4);1.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 1.7), and 1.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 2.0) for these three adverse outcomes, respectively, when we controlled for all 16 risk factors with logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal interpregnancy interval for preventing adverse perinatal outcomes is 18 to 23 months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed
GROVE, W. A. (1981) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.138.12.1644-a · Cited by 3,748
The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity
McCormick, M. C. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198501103120204 · Cited by 2,119
Best Subsets Logistic Regression
Hosmer, D. W., Jovanovic, B., & Lemeshow, S. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531779 · Cited by 1,176
School-Age Outcomes in Children with Birth Weights under 750 g
Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., Eiben, R., Schatschneider, C., & Mercuri-Minich, N. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199409223311201 · Cited by 641
A new definition of maternal depletion syndrome.
Winkvist, A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Habicht, J. P. (1992) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.82.5.691 · Cited by 324
A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age—specific neonatal mortality
Copper, R. L., Goldenberg, R. L., Creasy, R. K., DuBard, M. B., Davis, R. O., Entman, S. S., Iams, J. D., & Cliver, S. P. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90889-3 · Cited by 295
Birth Intervals and Perinatal Health: An Investigation of Three Hypotheses
Miller, J. E. (1991) · Family Planning Perspectives · doi:10.2307/2135451 · Cited by 132
The impact of short interpregnancy intervals on pregnancy outcomes in a low-income population.
Klerman, L. V., Cliver, S., & Goldenberg, R. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.8.1182 · Cited by 114
Alexander, G. R., Tompkins, M. E., Petersen, D. J., et al. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 113
Cited by
Cleland, J., Conde-Agudelo, A., Peterson, H., Ross, J., & Tsui, A. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60609-6 · Cited by 788
Risk factors for low birth weight: a review
Valero de Bernabé, J., Soriano, T., Albaladejo, R., Juarranz, M., Calle, M. E., Martı́nez, D., & Domı́nguez-Rojas, V. (2004) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.03.007 · Cited by 640
Investing in Family Planning: Key to Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals
Starbird, E., Norton, M., & Marcus, R. (2016) · Global Health: Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00374 · Cited by 469
Previous Cesarean Delivery and Risks of Placenta Previa and Placental Abruption
Getahun, D., Oyelese, Y., Salihu, H. M., & Ananth, C. V. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000206182.63788.80 · Cited by 449
Melki, I. S., Beydoun, H. A., Khogali, M., Tamim, H., & Yunis, K. A. (2004) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.012690 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, B.-P., Rolfs, R. T., Nangle, B. E., & Horan, J. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-02-25
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 589-594
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2313492691
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 27.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of the Interval between Pregnancies on Perinatal Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199902253400801
- The paper
- Zhu, B.-P., Rolfs, R. T., Nangle, B. E., & Horan, J. M. (1999). Effect of the Interval between Pregnancies on Perinatal Outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199902253400801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.