The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ is a non-invasive carcinoma that is unlikely to recur if completely excised. Margin width, the distance between the boundary of the lesion and the edge of the excised specimen, may be an important determinant of local recurrence. METHODS: Margin widths, determined by direct measurement or ocular micrometry, and standardized evaluation of the tumor for nuclear grade, comedonecrosis, and size were performed on 469 specimens of ductal carcinoma in situ from patients who had been treated with breast-conserving surgery with or without postoperative radiation therapy, according to the choice of the patient or her physician. We analyzed the results in relation to margin width and whether the patient received postoperative radiation therapy. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SE) estimated probability of recurrence at eight years was 0.04+/-0.02 among 133 patients whose excised lesions had margin widths of 10 mm or more in every direction. Among these patients there was no benefit from postoperative radiation therapy. There was also no statistically significant benefit from postoperative radiation therapy among patients with margin widths of 1 to <10 mm. In contrast, there was a statistically significant benefit from radiation among patients in whom margin widths were less than 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative radiation therapy did not lower the recurrence rate among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ that was excised with margins of 10 mm or more. Patients in whom the margin width is less than 1 mm can benefit from postoperative radiation therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R. G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E. R., Jeong, J.-H., & Wolmark, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022152 · Cited by 6,249
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast
Burstein, H. J., Polyak, K., Wong, J. S., Lester, S. C., & Kaelin, C. M. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra031301 · Cited by 759
Fisher, B., Bryant, J., Dignam, J. J., Wickerham, D. L., Mamounas, E. P., Fisher, E. R., Margolese, R. G., Nesbitt, L., Paik, S., Pisansky, T. M., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.11.101 · Cited by 667
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes
Virnig, B. A., Tuttle, T. M., Shamliyan, T., & Kane, R. L. (2010) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp482 · Cited by 608
Houghton, J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13859-7 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverstein, M. J., Lagios, M. D., Groshen, S., Waisman, J. R., Lewinsky, B. S., Martino, S., Gamagami, P., & Colburn, W. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-05-13
- Volume
- 340
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1455-1461
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2019972414
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199905133401902
- The paper
- Silverstein, M. J., Lagios, M. D., Groshen, S., Waisman, J. R., Lewinsky, B. S., Martino, S., Gamagami, P., & Colburn, W. J. (1999). The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199905133401902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.