Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrasound Therapy for Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder

Open access
Ebenbichler, Gerold R., Erdogmus, Celal B., Resch, Karl L., Funovics, Martin A., Kainberger, Franz, Barisani, Georg, Aringer, Martin, Nicolakis, Peter, Wiesinger, Günther F., Baghestanian, Mehrdad, Preisinger, Elisabeth, Weinstabl, Reinhard, Fialka-Moser, Veronika·1999·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Although ultrasound therapy is used to treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder, its efficacy has not been rigorously evaluated. We conducted a randomized, double-blind comparison of ultrasonography and sham insonation in patients with symptomatic calcific tendinitis verified by radiography. Patients were assigned to receive 24 15-minute sessions of either pulsed ultrasound (frequency, 0.89 MHz; intensity, 2.5 W per square centimeter; pulsed mode, 1:4) or an indistinguishable sham treatment to the area over the calcification. The first 15 treatments were given daily (five times per week), and the remainder were given three times a week for three weeks. Randomization was conducted according to shoulders rather than patients, so a patient with bilateral tendinitis might receive either or both therapies. RESULTS: We enrolled 63 consecutive patients (70 shoulders). Fifty-four patients (61 shoulders) completed the study. There were 32 shoulders in the ultrasound-treatment group and 29 in the sham-treatment group. After six weeks of treatment, calcium deposits had resolved in six shoulders (19 percent) in the ultrasound-treatment group and decreased by at least 50 percent in nine shoulders (28 percent), as compared with respective values of zero and three (10 percent) in the sham-treatment group (P=0.003). At the nine-month follow-up visit, calcium deposits had resolved in 13 shoulders (42 percent) in the ultrasound-treatment group and improved in 7 shoulders (23 percent), as compared with respective values of 2 (8 percent) and 3 (12 percent) in the sham-treatment group (P=0.002). At the end of treatment, patients who had received ultrasound treatment had greater decreases in pain and greater improvements in the quality of life than those who had received sham treatment; at nine months, the differences between the groups were no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder, ultrasound treatment helps resolve calcifications and is associated with short-term clinical improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199905203402002

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Ebenbichler, G. R., Erdogmus, C. B., Resch, K. L., Funovics, M. A., Kainberger, F., Barisani, G., Aringer, M., Nicolakis, P., Wiesinger, G. F., Baghestanian, M., Preisinger, E., Weinstabl, R., & Fialka-Moser, V.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1999-05-20
Volume
340
Issue
20
Pages
1533-1538
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2317941379
Cited by
299
References
12
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound Therapy for Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199905203402002
The paper
Ebenbichler, G. R., Erdogmus, C. B., Resch, K. L., Funovics, M. A., Kainberger, F., Barisani, G., Aringer, M., Nicolakis, P., Wiesinger, G. F., Baghestanian, M., Preisinger, E., Weinstabl, R., & Fialka-Moser, V. (1999). Ultrasound Therapy for Calcific Tendinitis of the Shoulder. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199905203402002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.