Cited by 498Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

A Mechanism of Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure

Javaheri, Shahrokh·1999·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Breathing is controlled by a negative-feedback system in which an increase in the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide stimulates breathing and a decrease inhibits it. Although enhanced sensitivity to carbon dioxide helps maintain the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide within a narrow range during waking hours, in some persons a large hyperventilatory response during sleep may lower the value below the apneic threshold, thereby resulting in central apnea. I tested the hypothesis that enhanced sensitivity to carbon dioxide contributes to the development of central sleep apnea in some patients with heart failure. Methods This prospective study included 20 men who had treated, stable heart failure with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ten had central sleep apnea, and 10 did not. The patients underwent polysomnography and studies of their ventilatory response to carbon dioxide. Results Patients who met the criteria for central sleep apnea had significantly more episodes of central apnea per hour than those without central sleep apnea (mean [+/-SD], 35+/-24 vs. 0.5+/-1.0 episodes per hour). Those with sleep apnea also had a significantly larger ventilatory response to carbon dioxide than those without central sleep apnea (5.1+/-3.1 vs. 2.1+/-1.0 liters per minute per millimeter of mercury, P=0.007), and there was a significant positive correlation between ventilatory response and the number of episodes of apnea and hypopnea per hour during sleep (r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199909233411304

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High loop gain due to a high controller gain can be seen in clinical situations such as high altitude or heart failure.

    “High loop gain due to a high controller gain (i.e., overly sensitive thermostat in the analogy above) can be seen in clinical situations such as high altitude or heart failure.351,352”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [351]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Javaheri, S.
Affiliations
Cincinnati VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Javaheri, Shahrokh
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1999-09-23
Volume
341
Issue
13
Pages
949-954
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2322820422
Cited by
498
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
central sleep apnea, heart failure, carbon dioxide sensitivity, ventilatory response to carbon dioxide, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory control
MeSH terms
Aged, Carbon Dioxide, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Respiratory Function Tests, Respiratory Physiological Phenomena, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Hypocapnia, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review