The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exogenous Reinfection as a Cause of Recurrent Tuberculosis after Curative Treatment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For decades it has been assumed that postprimary tuberculosis is usually caused by reactivation of endogenous infection rather than by a new, exogenous infection. METHODS: We performed DNA fingerprinting with restriction-fragment-length polymorphism analysis on pairs of isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from 16 compliant patients who had a relapse of pulmonary tuberculosis after curative treatment of postprimary tuberculosis. The patients lived in areas of South Africa where tuberculosis is endemic. Medical records were reviewed for clinical data. RESULTS: For 12 of the 16 patients, the restriction-fragment-length polymorphism banding patterns for the isolates obtained after the relapse were different from those for the isolates from the initial tuberculous disease. This finding indicates that reinfection was the cause of the recurrence of tuberculosis after curative treatment. Two patients had reinfections with a multidrug-resistant strain. All 15 patients who were tested for the human immunodeficiency virus were seronegative. CONCLUSIONS: Exogenous reinfection appears to be a major cause of postprimary tuberculosis after a previous cure in an area with a high incidence of this disease. This finding emphasizes the importance of achieving cures and of preventing anyone with infectious tuberculosis from exposing others to the disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The success and failure of BCG — implications for a novel tuberculosis vaccine
Andersen, P., & Doherty, T. M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1211 · Cited by 788
A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J., Kunst, H., Gibson, A., Cummins, E., Waugh, N., Drobniewski, F., & Lalvani, A. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11030 · Cited by 666
Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis–persistence, patience and winning by waiting
Manabe, Y. C., & Bishai, W. R. (2000) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/82139 · Cited by 275
Tuberculosis Vaccines and Prevention of Infection
Hawn, T. R., Day, T. A., Scriba, T. J., Hatherill, M., Hanekom, W. A., Evans, T. G., Churchyard, G. J., Kublin, J. G., Bekker, L.-G., & Self, S. G. (2014) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00021-14 · Cited by 164
The Pathogenesis of Tuberculosis-The Koch Phenomenon Reinstated.
Hunter, R. L. (2020) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens9100813 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rie, A., Warren, R., Richardson, M., Victor, T. C., Gie, R. P., Enarson, D. A., Beyers, N., & van Helden, P. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-10-14
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1174-1179
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336080030
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exogenous Reinfection as a Cause of Recurrent Tuberculosis after Curative Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199910143411602
- The paper
- van Rie, A., Warren, R., Richardson, M., Victor, T. C., Gie, R. P., Enarson, D. A., Beyers, N., & van Helden, P. D. (1999). Exogenous Reinfection as a Cause of Recurrent Tuberculosis after Curative Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199910143411602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.