The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial Injury
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants delivered by vacuum extraction or other operative techniques may be more likely to sustain major injuries than those delivered spontaneously, but the extent of the risk is unknown. METHODS: From a California data base, we identified 583,340 live-born singleton infants born to nulliparous women between 1992 and 1994 and weighing between 2500 and 4000 g. One third of the infants were delivered by operative techniques. We evaluated the relation between the mode of delivery and morbidity in the infants. RESULTS: Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1 of 860 infants delivered by vacuum extraction, 1 of 664 delivered with the use of forceps, 1 of 907 delivered by cesarean section during labor, 1 of 2750 delivered by cesarean section with no labor, and 1 of 1900 delivered spontaneously. As compared with the infants delivered spontaneously, those delivered by vacuum extraction had a significantly higher rate of subdural or cerebral hemorrhage (odds ratio, 2.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 3.9), as did the infants delivered with the use of forceps (odds ratio, 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 5.9) or cesarean section during labor (odds ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 3.4), but the rate of subdural or cerebral hemorrhage associated with vacuum extraction did not differ significantly from that associated with forceps use (odds ratio for the comparison with vacuum extraction, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.2) or cesarean section during labor (odds ratio, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of intracranial hemorrhage is higher among infants delivered by vacuum extraction, forceps, or cesarean section during labor than among infants delivered spontaneously, but the rate among infants delivered by cesarean section before labor is not higher, suggesting that the common risk factor for hemorrhage is abnormal labor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound
Ghi, T., Eggebø, T., Lees, C., Kalache, K., Rozenberg, P., Youssef, A., Salomon, L. J., & Tutschek, B. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19072 · Cited by 348
ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8: First and Second Stage Labor Management
ACOG Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines–Obstetrics (2024) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005447 · Cited by 135
Adelson, P. D., Pineda, J., Bell, M. J., Abend, N. S., Berger, R. P., Giza, C. C., Hotz, G., & Wainwright, M. S. (2012) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1952 · Cited by 93
Ghi, T., Conversano, F., Ramirez Zegarra, R., Pisani, P., Dall'Asta, A., Lanzone, A., Lau, W., Vimercati, A., Iliescu, D. G., Mappa, I., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.23739 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Towner, D., Castro, M. A., Eby-Wilkens, E., & Gilbert, W. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-12-02
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1709-1714
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2341671535
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199912023412301
- The paper
- Towner, D., Castro, M. A., Eby-Wilkens, E., & Gilbert, W. M. (1999). Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial Injury. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199912023412301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.