The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of the Volume of Procedures at Transplantation Centers on Mortality after Liver Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: For many complex surgical procedures there is an association between a low volume of procedures and an increased risk of death for the patients who undergo the procedures. We examined the effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on the risk of death after liver transplantation. We analyzed all liver transplantations performed in the United States between October 1, 1987, and April 30, 1994. Because the results for 1987 to 1991 were largely similar to those from 1992 to 1994, we focused on the more recent period. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1992, and April 30, 1994, 47 centers performed 20 or fewer liver transplantations each per year (total, 837 transplantations) and were designated low-volume centers, and 52 centers performed more than 20 transplantations each per year (total, 6526) and were designated high-volume centers. The one-year mortality rate for the low-volume centers was 25.9 percent, as compared with 20.0 percent for the high-volume centers. Thirteen centers, all of which had low volumes, had one-year mortality rates of more than 40 percent. Low-volume centers that were affiliated with high-volume centers, such as pediatric transplantation programs, had results similar to those of the high-volume centers. The one-year mortality rate at unaffiliated low-volume centers was 28.3 percent, as compared with a rate of 20.1 percent for the group of all high-volume centers plus affiliated low-volume centers (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a group, liver-transplantation centers in the United States that perform 20 or fewer transplantations per year have mortality rates that are significantly higher than those at centers that perform more than 20 transplantations per year. Information regarding the outcome of liver transplantation at transplantation centers should be made widely available to the public in a timely manner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gouma, D. J., van Geenen, R. C. I., van Gulik, T. M., de Haan, R. J., de Wit, L. T., Busch, O. R. C., & Obertop, H. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007 · Cited by 836
One Thousand Fifty-Six Hepatectomies Without Mortality in 8 Years
Imamura, H. (2003) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1198 · Cited by 835
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Influence of Hospital Procedure Volume on Outcomes Following Surgery for Colon Cancer
Schrag, D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3028 · Cited by 490
The Effect of Clustering of Outcomes on the Association of Procedure Volume and Surgical Outcomes
Panageas, K. S., Schrag, D., Riedel, E., Bach, P. B., & Begg, C. B. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-139-8-200310210-00009 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, E. B., Roberts, J. P., McBride, M. A., Schulak, J. A., & Hunsicker, L. G.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-12-30
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 2049-2053
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2331016682
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of the Volume of Procedures at Transplantation Centers on Mortality after Liver Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199912303412703
- The paper
- Edwards, E. B., Roberts, J. P., McBride, M. A., Schulak, J. A., & Hunsicker, L. G. (1999). The Effect of the Volume of Procedures at Transplantation Centers on Mortality after Liver Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199912303412703
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.