The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Methotrexate with Placebo for the Maintenance of Remission in Crohn's Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with Crohn's disease often have relapses. Better treatments are needed for the maintenance of remission. Although methotrexate is an effective short-term treatment for Crohn's disease, its role in maintaining remissions is not known. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of patients with chronically active Crohn's disease who had entered remission after 16 to 24 weeks of treatment with 25 mg of methotrexate given intramuscularly once weekly. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either methotrexate at a dose of 15 mg intramuscularly once weekly or placebo for 40 weeks. No other treatments for Crohn's disease were permitted. We compared the efficacy of treatment by analyzing the proportion of patients who remained in remission at week 40. Remission was defined as a score of 150 or less on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index. RESULTS: Forty patients received methotrexate, and 36 received placebo. At week 40, 26 patients (65 percent) were in remission in the methotrexate group, as compared with 14 (39 percent) in the placebo group (P=0.04; absolute reduction in the risk of relapse, 26.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.4 percent to 47.8 percent). Fewer patients in the methotrexate group than in the placebo group required prednisone for relapse (11 of 40 [28 percent] vs. 21 of 36 [58 percent], P=0.01). None of the patients who received methotrexate had a severe adverse event; one patient in this group withdrew because of nausea. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Crohn's disease who enter remission after treatment with methotrexate, a low dose of methotrexate maintains remission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies
Baumgart, D. C., & Sandborn, W. J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60751-x · Cited by 1,920
Faubion, W. A., Loftus, E. V., Harmsen, W. S., Zinsmeister, A. R., & Sandborn, W. J. (2001) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2001.26279 · Cited by 1,144
Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults
Carter, M. J., Lobo, A. J., & Travis, S. P. L. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2004.043372 · Cited by 1,083
Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: a potential therapeutic target in IBD
Na, Y. R., Stakenborg, M., Seok, S. H., & Matteoli, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0172-4 · Cited by 900
Metadata
- Authors
- Feagan, B. G., Fedorak, R. N., Irvine, E. J., Wild, G., Sutherland, L., Steinhart, A. H., Greenberg, G. R., Koval, J., Wong, C. J., Hopkins, M., Hanauer, S. B., & McDonald, J. W. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1627-1632
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2323383014
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Methotrexate with Placebo for the Maintenance of Remission in Crohn's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200006013422202
- The paper
- Feagan, B. G., Fedorak, R. N., Irvine, E. J., Wild, G., Sutherland, L., Steinhart, A. H., Greenberg, G. R., Koval, J., Wong, C. J., Hopkins, M., Hanauer, S. B., & McDonald, J. W. D. (2000). A Comparison of Methotrexate with Placebo for the Maintenance of Remission in Crohn's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200006013422202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.