The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urothelial Carcinoma Associated with the Use of a Chinese Herb (Aristolochia fangchi)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Chinese-herb nephropathy is a progressive form of renal fibrosis that develops in some patients who take weight-reducing pills containing Chinese herbs. Because of a manufacturing error, one of the herbs in these pills (Stephania tetrandra) was inadvertently replaced by Aristolochia fangchi, which is nephrotoxic and carcinogenic. METHODS: The diagnosis of a neoplastic lesion in the native urinary tract of a renal-transplant recipient who had Chinese-herb nephropathy prompted us to propose regular cystoscopic examinations and the prophylactic removal of the native kidneys and ureters in all our patients with end-stage Chinese-herb nephropathy who were being treated with either transplantation or dialysis. Surgical specimens were examined histologically and analyzed for the presence of DNA adducts formed by aristolochic acid. All prescriptions written for Chinese-herb weight-reducing compounds during the period of exposure (1990 to 1992) in these patients were obtained, and the cumulative doses were calculated. RESULTS: Among 39 patients who agreed to undergo prophylactic surgery, there were 18 cases of urothelial carcinoma (prevalence, 46 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 29 to 62 percent): 17 cases of carcinoma of the ureter, renal pelvis, or both and 1 papillary bladder tumor. Nineteen of the remaining patients had mild-to-moderate urothelial dysplasia, and two had normal urothelium. All tissue samples analyzed contained aristolochic acid-related DNA adducts. The cumulative dose of aristolochia was a significant risk factor for urothelial carcinoma, with total doses of more than 200 g associated with a higher risk of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of urothelial carcinoma among patients with end-stage Chinese-herb nephropathy (caused by aristolochia species) is a high.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
De Broe, M. E., & Elseviers, M. M. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802123380707 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Ekor, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00177 · Cited by 3,919
Bent, S. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0632-y · Cited by 611
Use of herbal products and potential interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases
Tachjian, A., Maria, V., & Jahangir, A. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.074 · Cited by 426
Jordan, S. A., Cunningham, D. G., & Marles, R. J. (2010) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.005 · Cited by 415
Brown, A. C. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2016.07.024 · Cited by 184
Toxic phytochemicals and their potential risks for human cancer
Bode, A. M., & Dong, Z. (2015) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-14-0160 · Cited by 140
Luo, L., Dong, L., Huang, Q., Ma, S., Fantke, P., Li, J., Jiang, J., Fitzgerald, M., Yang, J., Jia, Z., et al. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127477 · Cited by 81
Teschke, R., Larrey, D., Melchart, D., & Danan, G. (2016) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines3030018 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Nortier, J. L., Martinez, M.-C. M., Schmeiser, H. H., Arlt, V. M., Bieler, C. A., Petein, M., Depierreux, M. F., De Pauw, L., Abramowicz, D., Vereerstraeten, P., & Vanherweghem, J.-L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-06-08
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1686-1692
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2123489566
- Cited by
- 983
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.