Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 886

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy

Open access
Kemler, Marius A., Barendse, Gerard A.M., van Kleef, Maarten, de Vet, Henrica C.W., Rijks, Coen P.M., Furnée, Carina A., van den Wildenberg, Frans A.J.M.·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy (also called the complex regional pain syndrome) is a painful, disabling disorder for which there is no proven treatment. In observational studies, spinal cord stimulation has reduced the pain associated with the disorder. METHODS: We performed a randomized trial involving patients who had had reflex sympathetic dystrophy for at least six months. Thirty-six patients were assigned to receive treatment with spinal cord stimulation plus physical therapy, and 18 were assigned to receive physical therapy alone. The spinal cord stimulator was implanted only if a test stimulation was successful. We assessed the intensity of pain (on a visual-analogue scale from 0 cm [no pain] to 10 cm [very severe pain]), the global perceived effect (on a scale from 1 [worst ever] to 7 [best ever]), functional status, and the health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The test stimulation of the spinal cord was successful in 24 patients; the other 12 patients did not receive implanted stimulators. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the group assigned to receive spinal cord stimulation plus physical therapy had a mean reduction of 2.4 cm in the intensity of pain at six months, as compared with an increase of 0.2 cm in the group assigned to receive physical therapy alone (P<0.001 for the comparison between the two groups). In addition, the proportion of patients with a score of 6 ("much improved") for the global perceived effect was much higher in the spinal cord stimulation group than in the control group (39 percent vs. 6 percent, P=0.01). There was no clinically important improvement in functional status. The health-related quality of life improved only in the 24 patients who actually underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator. Six of the 24 patients had complications that required additional procedures, including removal of the device in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: In carefully selected patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy, electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can reduce pain and improve the health-related quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200008313430904

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 886

Metadata

Authors
Kemler, M. A., Barendse, G. A. M., van Kleef, M., de Vet, H. C. W., Rijks, C. P. M., Furnée, C. A., & van den Wildenberg, F. A. J. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-08-31
Volume
343
Issue
9
Pages
618-624
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2334756126
Cited by
886
References
4
FWCI
28.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200008313430904
The paper
Kemler, M. A., Barendse, G. A. M., van Kleef, M., de Vet, H. C. W., Rijks, C. P. M., Furnée, C. A., & van den Wildenberg, F. A. J. M. (2000). Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200008313430904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.