Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 446

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Randomized Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Completely Resected Stage II or IIIa Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Keller, Steven M., Adak, Sudeshna, Wagner, Henry, Herskovic, Arnold, Komaki, Ritsuko, Brooks, Burke J., Perry, Michael C., Livingston, Robert B., Johnson, David H.·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized trial to determine whether combination chemotherapy plus thoracic radiotherapy is superior to thoracic radiotherapy alone in prolonging survival and preventing local recurrence in patients with completely resected stage II or IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: After surgical staging and resection of the tumor (usually by lobectomy or pneumonectomy), the patients were randomly assigned to receive either four 28-day cycles of cisplatin (60 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously on day 1) and etoposide (120 mg per square meter intravenously on days 1, 2, and 3) administered concurrently with radiotherapy (a total of 50.4 Gy, given in 28 daily fractions) or radiotherapy alone (a total of 50.4 Gy, given in 28 daily fractions). RESULTS: Of the 488 patients who were enrolled in the study, 242 were assigned to receive radiotherapy alone and 246 were assigned to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median duration of follow-up was 44 months. Treatment-associated mortality was 1.2 percent in the group given radiotherapy alone and 1.6 percent in the group given chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median survival was 39 months in the group given radiotherapy and 38 months in the group given chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P= 0.56 by the log-rank test). The relative likelihood of survival among patients assigned to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as compared with those assigned to receive radiotherapy alone, was 0.93 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.18). Intrathoracic disease recurred within the radiation field in 30 of 234 patients (13 percent) in the group given radiotherapy and in 28 of 236 patients (12 percent) in the group given chemotherapy and radiotherapy (P=0.84); data on recurrence were not available for 18 patients. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with radiotherapy alone, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide does not decrease the risk of intrathoracic recurrence or prolong survival in patients with completely resected stage II or IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200010263431703

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 446

Metadata

Authors
Keller, S. M., Adak, S., Wagner, H., Herskovic, A., Komaki, R., Brooks, B. J., Perry, M. C., Livingston, R. B., & Johnson, D. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-10-26
Volume
343
Issue
17
Pages
1217-1222
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2315493012
Cited by
446
References
0
FWCI
24.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Completely Resected Stage II or IIIa Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200010263431703
The paper
Keller, S. M., Adak, S., Wagner, H., Herskovic, A., Komaki, R., Brooks, B. J., Perry, M. C., Livingston, R. B., & Johnson, D. H. (2000). A Randomized Trial of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Completely Resected Stage II or IIIa Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200010263431703

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.