Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relapses and Progression of Disability in Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Confavreux, Christian, Vukusic, Sandra, Moreau, Thibault, Adeleine, Patrice·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of the patterns of onset of multiple sclerosis and relapses of the disease on the time course of irreversible disability is controversial. METHODS: In 1844 patients with multiple sclerosis who were followed for a mean (+/- SD) of 11 +/- 10 years, we determined the time of the clinical onset of the disease, the initial course (relapsing-remitting or progressive) and the subsequent course (relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, or primary progressive), the times of relapses, the time to the onset of irreversible disability, and the time course of progressive, irreversible disability. We used three scores on the Kurtzke Disability Status Scale (range, 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) as measures of the severity and progression of disability: a score of 4 (limited walking ability but able to walk for more than 500 m without aid or rest), a score of 6 (ability to walk with unilateral support no more than 100 m without rest), and a score of 7 (ability to walk no more than 10 m without rest while leaning against a wall or holding onto furniture for support). We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine the influence of relapses on the time to the onset of irreversible disability. RESULTS: The median times from the onset of multiple sclerosis to the assignment of a score of 4, a score of 6, and a score of 7 on the disability scale were longer among the 1562 patients with a relapsing-remitting onset of disease (11.4, 23.1, and 33.1 years, respectively) than among the 282 patients who had progressive disease from the onset (0.0, 7.1, and 13.4 years, respectively; P<0.001 for all comparisons). In contrast, the times from the assignment of a score of 4 to a score of 6 were similar in the two groups (5.7 and 5.4 years, P=0.74). The time course of progressive, irreversible disease among patients with the primary progressive type of multiple sclerosis was not affected by the presence or absence of superimposed relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multiple sclerosis, relapses do not significantly influence the progression of irreversible disability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200011163432001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,309

Metadata

Authors
Confavreux, C., Vukusic, S., Moreau, T., & Adeleine, P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-11-16
Volume
343
Issue
20
Pages
1430-1438
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2326826867
Cited by
1,309
References
2
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relapses and Progression of Disability in Multiple Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200011163432001
The paper
Confavreux, C., Vukusic, S., Moreau, T., & Adeleine, P. (2000). Relapses and Progression of Disability in Multiple Sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200011163432001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.