The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Continuing Value of the Apgar Score for the Assessment of Newborn Infants
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 10-point Apgar score has been used to assess the condition and prognosis of newborn infants throughout the world for almost 50 years. Some investigators have proposed that measurement of pH in umbilical-artery blood is a more objective method of assessing newborn infants. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort analysis of 151,891 live-born singleton infants without malformations who were delivered at 26 weeks of gestation or later at an inner-city public hospital between January 1988 and December 1998. Paired Apgar scores and umbilical-artery blood pH values were determined for 145,627 infants to assess which test best predicted neonatal death during the first 28 days after birth. RESULTS: For 13,399 infants born before term (at 26 to 36 weeks of gestation), the neonatal mortality rate was 315 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 5 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 to 10. For 132,228 infants born at term (37 weeks of gestation or later), the mortality rate was 244 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 0.2 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 to 10. The risk of neonatal death in term infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 (relative risk, 1460; 95 percent confidence interval, 835 to 2555) was eight times the risk in term infants with umbilical-artery blood pH values of 7.0 or less (180; 95 percent confidence interval, 97 to 334). CONCLUSIONS: The Apgar scoring system remains as relevant for the prediction of neonatal survival today as it was almost 50 years ago.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant.
Apgar, V. (1953) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-195301000-00041 · Cited by 2,015
Cited by
Reilly, B. M., & Evans, A. T. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00009 · Cited by 794
Philip, A. G. S. (2005) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000151693.46655.66 · Cited by 592
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, & Committee on Obstetric Practice (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0325 · Cited by 371
Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study
Iliodromiti, S., Mackay, D. F., Smith, G. C. S., Pell, J. P., & Nelson, S. M. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61135-1 · Cited by 282
Ross, L. E., Grigoriadis, S., Mamisashvili, L., VonderPorten, E. H., Roerecke, M., Rehm, J., Dennis, C.-L., Koren, G., Steiner, M., Mousmanis, P., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.684 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Casey, B. M., McIntire, D. D., & Leveno, K. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-02-15
- Volume
- 344
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 467-471
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2312865146
- Cited by
- 826
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Continuing Value of the Apgar Score for the Assessment of Newborn Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200102153440701
- The paper
- Casey, B. M., McIntire, D. D., & Leveno, K. J. (2001). The Continuing Value of the Apgar Score for the Assessment of Newborn Infants. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200102153440701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.