Cited by 282Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Apgar score and the risk of cause-specific infant mortality: a population-based cohort study

Open access
Iliodromiti, Stamatina, Mackay, Daniel F, Smith, Gordon C S, Pell, Jill P, Nelson, Scott M·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

Background The Apgar score has been used worldwide as an index of early neonatal condition for more than 60 years. With advances in health-care service provision, neonatal resuscitation, and infant care, its present relevance is unclear. The aim of the study was to establish the strength of the relation between Apgar score at 5 min and the risk of neonatal and infant mortality, subdivided by specific causes.Methods We linked routine discharge and mortality data for all births in Scotland, UK between 1992 and 2010. We restricted our analyses to singleton livebirths, in women aged over 10 years, with a gestational age at delivery between 22 and 44 weeks, and excluded deaths due to congenital anomalies or isoimmunisation. We calculated the relative risks (RRs) of neonatal and infant death of neonates with low (0-3) and intermediate (4-6) Apgar scores at 5 min referent to neonates with normal Apgar score (7-10) using binomial log-linear modelling with adjustment for confounders. Analyses were stratified by gestational age at birth because it was a significant effect modifier. Missing covariate data were imputed.Findings Complete data were available for 1,029,207 eligible livebirths. Across all gestational strata, low Apgar score at 5 min was associated with an increased risk of neonatal and infant death. However, the strength of the association (adjusted RR, 95% CI referent to Apgar 7-10) was strongest at term (p<0·0001). A low Apgar (0-3) was associated with an adjusted RR of 359·4 (95% CI 277·3-465·9) for early neonatal death, 30·5 (18·0-51·6) for late neonatal death, and 50·2 (42·8-59·0) for infant death. We noted similar associations of a lower magnitude for intermediate Apgar (4-6). The strongest associations were for deaths attributed to anoxia and low Apgar (0-3) for term infants (RR 961·7, 95% CI 681·3-1357·5) and preterm infants (141·7, 90·1-222·8). No association between Apgar score at 5 min and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome was noted at any gestational age (RR 0·6, 95% CI 0·1-4·6 at term; 1·2, 0·3-4·8 at preterm).Interpretation Low Apgar score at 5 min was strongly associated with the risk of neonatal and infant death. Our findings support its continued usefulness in contemporary practice.Funding None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61135-1

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iliodromiti, S., Mackay, D. F., Smith, G. C. S., Pell, J. P., & Nelson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Scott M
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
384
Issue
9956
Pages
1749-1755
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2061760881
Cited by
282
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
37.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
Apgar score, neonatal mortality, infant mortality, cause-specific mortality, neonatal anoxia, preterm infants, gestational age, term infants, neonatal resuscitation, neonatal assessment, mortality risk stratification, neonatal intensive care admission, neonatal sepsis, neonatal jaundice, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory distress
MeSH terms
Adult, Apgar Score, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Retrospective Studies, Scotland, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Likelihood Functions, Linear Models, Databases, Factual, Risk Assessment, Term Birth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review