Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

Dennery, Phyllis A., Seidman, Daniel S., Stevenson, David K.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Icterus neonatorum, or neonatal jaundice, has long been recognized.1 The term “kernicterus” was introduced in the early 1900s to refer to the yellow staining of the basal ganglia observed in infants who died with severe jaundice.2 From the 1950s through the 1970s, because of a high incidence of Rh hemolytic disease and kernicterus, pediatricians were aggressive in treating jaundice.3 However, several factors have changed the management of jaundice. Studies in the 1980s and 1990s suggested that kernicterus from jaundice was rare and that too many infants were being treated unnecessarily.47 Also, newborn infants were being discharged from the hospital . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200102223440807

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Dennery, P. A., Seidman, D. S., & Stevenson, D. K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-02-22
Volume
344
Issue
8
Pages
581-590
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4234144206
Cited by
598
References
0
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200102223440807
The paper
Dennery, P. A., Seidman, D. S., & Stevenson, D. K. (2001). Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200102223440807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.