The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Each year in the United States, approximately 60 percent of women with a prior cesarean delivery who become pregnant again attempt labor. Concern persists that a trial of labor may increase the risk of uterine rupture, an uncommon but serious obstetrical complication. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort analysis using data from all primiparous women who gave birth to live singleton infants by cesarean section in civilian hospitals in Washington State from 1987 through 1996 and who delivered a second singleton child during the same period (a total of 20,095 women). We assessed the risk of uterine rupture for deliveries with spontaneous onset of labor, those with labor induced by prostaglandins, and those in which labor was induced by other means; these three groups of deliveries were compared with repeated cesarean delivery without labor. RESULTS: Uterine rupture occurred at a rate of 1.6 per 1000 among women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor (11 women), 5.2 per 1000 among women with spontaneous onset of labor (56 women), 7.7 per 1000 among women whose labor was induced without prostaglandins (15 women), and 24.5 per 1000 among women with prostaglandin-induced labor (9 women). As compared with the risk in women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor, uterine rupture was more likely among women with spontaneous onset of labor (relative risk, 3.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 6.0), induction of labor without prostaglandins (relative risk, 4.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 9.7), and induction with prostaglandins (relative risk, 15.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 8.1 to 30.0). CONCLUSIONS: For women with one prior cesarean delivery, the risk of uterine rupture is higher among those whose labor is induced than among those with repeated cesarean delivery without labor. Labor induced with a prostaglandin confers the highest risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean Section
McMahon, M. J., Luther, E. R., Bowes, W. A., & Olshan, A. F. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609053351001 · Cited by 700
Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: Maternal and fetal consequences
Leung, A. S., Leung, E. K., & Paul, R. H. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90032-e · Cited by 353
Sj, V., Martin, J. A., Sc, C., Mathews, T. J., & Park, M. M. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 247
Plaut, M. M., Schwartz, M. L., & Lubarsky, S. L. (1999) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70049-9 · Cited by 243
Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Study
FLAMM, B. L., GOINGS, J. R., LIU, Y., & WOLDE-TSADIK, G. (1994) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-199406000-00005 · Cited by 241
Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation
Rageth, J. (1999) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00446-3 · Cited by 227
Wing, D. (1998) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00553-x · Cited by 217
Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries
Caughey, A. B., Shipp, T. D., Repke, J. T., Zelop, C. M., Cohen, A., & Lieberman, E. (1999) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70317-0 · Cited by 175
Parrish, K. M., Holt, V. L., Connell, F. A., Williams, B., & LoGerfo, J. P. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116834 · Cited by 153
Self-citationVaginal Birth After Cesarean and Uterine Rupture Rates in California
Gregory, K. D., Korst, L. M., Cane, P., Platt, L. D., & Kahn, K. L. (1999) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00422-6 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery
Landon, M. B., Hauth, J. C., Leveno, K. J., Spong, C. Y., Leindecker, S., Varner, M. W., Moawad, A. H., Caritis, S. N., Harper, M., Wapner, R. J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040405 · Cited by 1,286
Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review
Marshall, N. E., Fu, R., & Guise, J.-M. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035 · Cited by 565
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003078 · Cited by 530
Justus Hofmeyr, G., Say, L., & Metin Gülmezoglu, A. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V. L., Easterling, T. R., & Martin, D. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-07-05
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2000985158
- Cited by
- 932
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 63.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200107053450101
- The paper
- Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V. L., Easterling, T. R., & Martin, D. P. (2001). Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200107053450101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.