Cited by 973BRCA gene mutations in cancerWomen's cancer prevention and managementBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breast Cancer after Prophylactic Bilateral Mastectomy in Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation

Open access
Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, van Geel, Bert, van Putten, Wim L.J., Henzen-Logmans, Sonja C., Seynaeve, Caroline, Menke-Pluymers, Marian B.E., Bartels, Carina C.M., Verhoog, Leon C., van den Ouweland, Ans M.W., Niermeijer, Martinus F., Brekelmans, Cecile T.M., Klijn, Jan G.M.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have a high risk of breast cancer and may choose to undergo prophylactic bilateral total mastectomy. We investigated the efficacy of this procedure in such women. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 139 women with a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who were enrolled in a breast-cancer surveillance program at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. At the time of enrollment, none of the women had a history of breast cancer. Seventy-six of these women eventually underwent prophylactic mastectomy, and the other 63 remained under regular surveillance. The effect of mastectomy on the incidence of breast cancer was analyzed by the Cox proportional-hazards method in which mastectomy was modeled as a time-dependent covariate. RESULTS: No cases of breast cancer were observed after prophylactic mastectomy after a mean (+/-SE) follow-up of 2.9+/-1.4 years, whereas eight breast cancers developed in women under regular surveillance after a mean follow-up of 3.0+/-1.5 years (P=0.003; hazard ratio, 0; 95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 0.36). The actuarial mean five-year incidence of breast cancer among all women in the surveillance group was 17+/-7 percent. On the basis of an exponential model, the yearly incidence of breast cancer in this group was 2.5 percent. The observed number of breast cancers in the surveillance group was consistent with the expected number (ratio of observed to expected cases, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 3.7; P=0.80). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, prophylactic bilateral total mastectomy reduces the incidence of breast cancer at three years of follow-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200107193450301

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Whittemore AS, 1997, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 496
  2. Hartmann LC, 2000, Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 41, 222
  3. Kriege M, 2000, Eur J Cancer, 36, S137
  4. Zion SM, 2000, Prog Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 19, 441a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 970

Metadata

Authors
Meijers-Heijboer, H., van Geel, B., van Putten, W. L. J., Henzen-Logmans, S. C., Seynaeve, C., Menke-Pluymers, M. B. E., Bartels, C. C. M., Verhoog, L. C., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., Niermeijer, M. F., Brekelmans, C. T. M., & Klijn, J. G. M.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-07-19
Volume
345
Issue
3
Pages
159-164
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2046809735
Cited by
973
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 42
FWCI
35.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
breast cancer, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, hereditary breast cancer, breast cancer incidence, breast cancer surveillance, genetic susceptibility to cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Prospective Studies, Transcription Factors, Mastectomy, Simple, Proportional Hazards Models, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review