Cited by 955BRCA gene mutations in cancerMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Recommendations for Follow-up Care of Individuals With an Inherited Predisposition to Cancer: II. BRCA1 and BRCA2

Burke, Wylie·1997·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for cancer surveillance and risk reduction for individuals carrying mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. PARTICIPANTS: A task force with expertise in medical genetics, oncology, primary care, gastroenterology, and epidemiology convened by the Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium (CGSC), organized by National Human Genome Research Institute (previously the National Center for Human Genome Research). EVIDENCE: Studies evaluating cancer risk, surveillance, and risk reduction in individuals genetically susceptible to breast and ovarian cancer were identified using MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine) and from bibliographies of articles thus identified. Indexing terms used were "genetics" in combination with "breast cancer," "ovarian cancer," and "screening," or "surveillance" in combination with "cancer family" and "BRCA1" and "BRCA2." For studies evaluating specific interventions, quality of evidence was assessed using criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The task force developed recommendations through discussions over a 14-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of cancer surveillance or other measures to reduce risk in individuals who carry cancer-predisposing mutations is unknown. Based on expert opinion concerning presumptive benefit, early breast cancer and ovarian cancer screening are recommended for individuals with BRCA1 mutations and early breast cancer screening for those with BRCA2 mutations. No rec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1997.03540360065034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, W.
Corresponding author
Burke, Wylie
Venue
JAMA
Published
1997-03-26
Volume
277
Issue
12
Pages
997
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4236095073
Cited by
955
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
44.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
BRCA1, BRCA2, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, cancer surveillance, cancer risk reduction, breast cancer screening, ovarian cancer screening, prophylactic surgery, cancer susceptibility
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Contraceptives, Oral, Decision Making, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Markers, Genetic Testing, Heterozygote, Humans, Life Style, Male, Mammography, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovariectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Transcription Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Breast Self-Examination, CA-125 Antigen, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review