The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Among patients who have undergone high-risk operations for cancer, postoperative mortality rates are often lower at hospitals where more of these procedures are performed. We undertook a population-based study to estimate the extent to which the number of procedures performed at a hospital (hospital volume) is associated with survival after resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We studied patients 65 years old or older who received a diagnosis of stage I, II, or IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer between 1985 and 1996, resided in 1 of the 10 study areas covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, and underwent surgery at a hospital that participates in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2118 patients and 76 hospitals). RESULTS: The volume of procedures at the hospital was positively associated with the survival of patients (P<0.001). Five years after surgery, 44 percent of patients who underwent operations at the hospitals with the highest volume were alive, as compared with 33 percent of those who underwent operations at the hospitals with the lowest volume. Patients at the highest-volume hospitals also had lower rates of postoperative complications (20 percent vs. 44 percent) and lower 30-day mortality (3 percent vs. 6 percent) than those at the lowest-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo resection for lung cancer at hospitals that perform large numbers of such procedures are likely to survive longer than patients who have such surgery at hospitals with a low volume of lung-resection procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Romano, P. S., Roos, L. L., & Jollis, J. G. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 · Cited by 1,717
Cited by
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Haider, A. H., Scott, V. K., Rehman, K. A., Velopulos, C., Bentley, J. M., Cornwell, E. E., & Al-Refaie, W. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.014 · Cited by 593
Computed Tomography Screening and Lung Cancer Outcomes
Bach, P. B. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.9.953 · Cited by 567
Self-citationLong-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers
Fong, Y., Gonen, M., Rubin, D., Radzyner, M., & Brennan, M. F. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Bach, P. B., Cramer, L. D., Schrag, D., Downey, R. J., Gelfand, S. E., & Begg, C. B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-07-19
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-188
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2319687260
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200107193450306
- The paper
- Bach, P. B., Cramer, L. D., Schrag, D., Downey, R. J., Gelfand, S. E., & Begg, C. B. (2001). The Influence of Hospital Volume on Survival after Resection for Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200107193450306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.