Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers

Open access
Fong, Yuman, Gonen, Mithat, Rubin, David, Radzyner, Mark, Brennan, Murray F.·2005·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Background: A number of studies have demonstrated that surgical resection at high-volume centers is associated with improved short-term perioperative outcome. Whether long-term results after resection of visceral malignancies are superior at high-volume centers is largely unknown. Methods: All patients who were subjected to pancreatectomy or hepatectomy for cancer in the years 1995 and 1996 were identified in the National Medicare database. Data extracted and examined include demographics, comorbidities, and long-term survival. All survival was confirmed through 2001, providing actual 5-year survival. Long-term survival was examined as related to hospital volume. Results: In the study period, there were 2592 pancreatectomies and 3734 hepatectomies performed at 1101 and 1284 institutions, respectively. High-volume center was defined as >25 cases/y. By this definition, there were 10 high-volume centers for pancreatectomy and 12 centers for hepatectomy performing 11% (n = 291) of the pancreatectomies and 12% (n = 474) of the hepatectomies in this study period. Comparison by log-rank demonstrated superior survival for patients resected at high-volume centers (pancreatectomy: P = 0.001; hepatectomy: P = 0.02). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis. All analyses included an adjustment for within-center correlation. Conclusion: Superior long-term survival is associated with complex visceral resections for cancer at high-volume centers. A number of studies have demonstrated that surgical resection at high-volume centers is associated with increased short-term perioperative outcome. The current paper examines the effect of hospital volume on the long-term outcome. The data presented demonstrates that superior long-term survival is also associated with resections of the pancreas or the liver in high-volume centers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Fong, Y., Gonen, M., Rubin, D., Radzyner, M., & Brennan, M. F.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2005-10
Volume
242
Issue
4
Pages
540-547
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063066521
Cited by
398
References
22
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b
The paper
Fong, Y., Gonen, M., Rubin, D., Radzyner, M., & Brennan, M. F. (2005). Long-Term Survival Is Superior After Resection for Cancer in High-Volume Centers. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000184190.20289.4b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.