Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Risk Clonal Hematopoiesis as the Origin of AITL and NPM1 -Mutated AML

Tiacci, Enrico, Venanzi, Alessandra, Ascani, Stefano, Marra, Andrea, Cardinali, Valeria, Martino, Giovanni, Codoni, Veronica, Schiavoni, Gianluca, Martelli, Maria Paola, Falini, Brunangelo·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Two Cancers in CHIP A patient with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) received the diagnosis of lymphoma with activation of RHOA. Approximately 1 year later, NPM1-mutated acute ...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1806413

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000261 · DOI
  2. 10.1182/blood-2006-03-007013 · DOI

Cited by

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Tiacci, E., Venanzi, A., Ascani, S., Marra, A., Cardinali, V., Martino, G., Codoni, V., Schiavoni, G., Martelli, M. P., & Falini, B.
Affiliations
Perugia University, Perugia, Italy
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-09-06
Volume
379
Issue
10
Pages
981-984
ISSN
  • 0028-4793
  • 1533-4406
Cited by
78
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG 2016 n.18568)
  • H2020 European Research Council (ERC Adv Grant 2016 n. 740230)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review