Preliminary Results of a Trial of Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease
Abstract
Atabecestat in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease A preliminary analysis of a trial involving participants with brain amyloid deposition who are at risk for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease showed ...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inadequate efficacy and/or severe side effects in clinical trials with BACE1 inhibitors such as Verubecestat and Atabecestat have been reported.
“Similarly, inadequate efficacy and/or severe side effects in clinical trials with BACE1 inhibitors such as Verubecestat and Atabecestat [638–640] have also been reported.”
From Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [640]
All BACE inhibitors tested in randomized clinical trials were discontinued for futility or safety reasons.
“All BACE inhibitors investigated in randomized clinical trials were discontinued for either futility or safety reasons.”
From The β-Secretase BACE1 in Alzheimer’s Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
Atabecestat was discontinued after a preclinical Alzheimer disease trial showed frequent hepatotoxicity and worse cognition than placebo.
“Atabecestat was discontinued after a trial in preclinical AD demonstrated frequent hepatotoxicity and worse cognitive outcomes than placebo (Henley et al., 2019).”
From Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies (2019) · cites this paper as Henley et al., 2019
The lanabecestat phase 3 investigation was halted due to a lack of efficacy, and the verubecestat and atabecestat trials were halted owing to inefficacy and safety concerns, respectively.
“The lanabecestat phase 3 investigation was halted due to a lack of efficacy, and the verubecestat and atabecestat trials were halted as well owing to inefficacy and safety concerns, respectively.”
From An update on the novel and approved drugs for Alzheimer disease (2022) · cites this paper as Henley et al., 2019
All BACE inhibitor treatments reduced cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 in a dose-dependent manner, but without providing any cognitive or functional benefits, and several were inadequately tolerated and ineffective in subjects with prodromal Alzheimer's disease.
“All the treatments reduced cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 in a dose-dependent manner, but without providing any cognitive or functional benefits, and several of them were inadequately tolerated and ineffective in subjects with prodromal AD.”
From An update on the novel and approved drugs for Alzheimer disease (2022) · cites this paper as Henley et al., 2019
Clinical studies with BACE inhibitors such as lanabecestat, verubecestat, and atabecestat have lately been terminated due to unanticipated challenges.
“Due to unanticipated challenges, clinical studies with BACE inhibitors such as lanabecestat, verubecestat, and atabecestat have lately been terminated (Egan et al., 2019, Henley et al., 2019).”
From An update on the novel and approved drugs for Alzheimer disease (2022) · cites this paper as Henley et al., 2019
The phase 3 lanabecestat trial was discontinued due to lack of efficacy, whereas verubecestat and atabecestat trials were ceased due to ineffectiveness and safety reasons (rash, falls, liver toxicity, and neuropsychiatric symptoms).
“The phase 3 lanabecestat trial was discontinued due to lack of efficacy, whereas verubecestat and atabecestat trials were ceased due to ineffectiveness, as well as safety reasons (rash, falls, liver toxicity, and neuropsychiatric symptoms).10,32-34”
From Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer Disease: An Update (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
Clinical trials with the BACE inhibitors lanabecestat, verubecestat, and atabecestat have been recently discontinued due to unexpected difficulties.
“However, the clinical trials with the BACE inhibitors lanabecestat,32 verubecestat,33 and atabecestat34 have been recently discontinued due to unexpected difficulties.”
From Current and Future Treatments in Alzheimer Disease: An Update (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 197
- Authors
- Henley, D., Raghavan, N., Sperling, R., Aisen, P., Raman, R., & Romano, G.
- Affiliations
- Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute, San Diego, CA
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, NJ
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-04-11
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1483-1485
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2939644735
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Janssen Research & Development, a division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- preclinical Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, brain amyloid deposition, gamma-secretase inhibitors, dementia prevention, clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Cyclic S-Oxides, Humans, Thiadiazines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review