Cited by 24Fatty Acid Research and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology

Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl

Claudio Borghi, Federica Fogacci, Arrigo F.G. Cicero·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Bhatt et al. report that long-term supplementation with high doses of EPA reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. This finding is partially in contrast to the recently reported results of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, mainly including trials of lower doses of polyunsaturated fatty acids.1,2 In our opinion, the positive effect observed by Bhatt et al. could have also been mediated by an effect of high doses of EPA on blood-pressure levels, which were not strictly monitored in the trial.3 In a comprehensive meta-analysis on the effects of n−3 fatty acids on blood pressure, including 70 randomized trials with an average dose of n−3 fatty acids of 3.8 g per day, patients with hypertension had a clinically relevant average decrease in systolic blood pressure of 4.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 6.1) and in diastolic blood pressure of 3.0 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3).4 This effect is not negligible from either a clinical or an epidemiologic point of view.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1902165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of total ischemic events in REDUCE-IT found a significant 30% reduction.

    “Analysis of total ischemic events (first and subsequent events) found a significant 30% reduction, with consistent benefits across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.5–9”
  • In REDUCE-IT, benefits of icosapent ethyl on total ischemic events were consistent across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.

    “Analysis of total ischemic events (first and subsequent events) found a significant 30% reduction, with consistent benefits across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.5–9”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 24

Authors
Borghi, C., Fogacci, F., & Cicero, A. F. G.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
380
Issue
17
Pages
1677-1678
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2980777290
Cited by
24
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Keywords
icosapent ethyl, eicosapentaenoic acid, cardiovascular risk reduction, omega-3 fatty acids, blood pressure, hypertension, cardiovascular events, meta-analysis critique
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Risk Factors, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Hypertriglyceridemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review