Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl
Abstract
Bhatt et al. report that long-term supplementation with high doses of EPA reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. This finding is partially in contrast to the recently reported results of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, mainly including trials of lower doses of polyunsaturated fatty acids.1,2 In our opinion, the positive effect observed by Bhatt et al. could have also been mediated by an effect of high doses of EPA on blood-pressure levels, which were not strictly monitored in the trial.3 In a comprehensive meta-analysis on the effects of n−3 fatty acids on blood pressure, including 70 randomized trials with an average dose of n−3 fatty acids of 3.8 g per day, patients with hypertension had a clinically relevant average decrease in systolic blood pressure of 4.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 6.1) and in diastolic blood pressure of 3.0 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3).4 This effect is not negligible from either a clinical or an epidemiologic point of view.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysis of total ischemic events in REDUCE-IT found a significant 30% reduction.
“Analysis of total ischemic events (first and subsequent events) found a significant 30% reduction, with consistent benefits across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.5–9”
From REDUCE-IT USA: Results From the 3146 Patients Randomized in the United States (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
In REDUCE-IT, benefits of icosapent ethyl on total ischemic events were consistent across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.
“Analysis of total ischemic events (first and subsequent events) found a significant 30% reduction, with consistent benefits across baseline and achieved triglyceride levels.5–9”
From REDUCE-IT USA: Results From the 3146 Patients Randomized in the United States (2020) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Borghi, C., Fogacci, F., & Cicero, A. F. G.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- ORCID
- Arrigo F.G. Cicero
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-04-25
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1677-1678
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2980777290
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
- Keywords
- icosapent ethyl, eicosapentaenoic acid, cardiovascular risk reduction, omega-3 fatty acids, blood pressure, hypertension, cardiovascular events, meta-analysis critique
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Risk Factors, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Hypertriglyceridemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review