Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI use in healthcare has steadily expanded in diagnostics, decision support, administration, and population health.
“With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), its use in healthcare, covering diagnostics, decision support, administration, and population health, has steadily expanded [1].”
From Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The “Artificial Intelligence in Medicine” section (page unavailable) describes increasing AI use in image interpretation, medical notes, insurance claims, and analysis of large clinical databases. These examples support expanding use across several healthcare functions, but the copy does not specifically establish use in population health or a steady rate of expansion. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTraditional machine learning models have supported tumor classification, survival prediction, and risk stratification using structured clinical or genomic data.
“traditional ML models, such as support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, and random forests, have supported tumor classification, survival prediction, and risk stratification using structured clinical or genomic data [6,12,13,14].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine
Lee, P., Bubeck, S., & Petro, J. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr2214184 · Cited by 1,738 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Clinical Medicine, 2023
Haug, C. J., & Drazen, J. M. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2302038 · Cited by 1,215 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence
Finlayson, S. G., Subbaswamy, A., Singh, K., Bowers, J., Kupke, A., Zittrain, J., Kohane, I. S., & Saria, S. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2104626 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health
De Angelis, L., Baglivo, F., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G. P., Ferragina, P., Tozzi, A. E., & Rizzo, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Medical education and physician training in the era of artificial intelligence
Xu, Y., Jiang, Z., Ting, D. S. W., Kow, A. W. C., Bello, F., Car, J., Tham, Y.-C., & Wong, T. Y. (2024) · Singapore Medical Journal · doi:10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-203 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Jebreen, K., Radwan, E., Kammoun-Rebai, W., Alattar, E., Radwan, A., Safi, W., Radwan, W., & Alajez, M. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05465-4 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review
Simoni, J., Urtubia-Fernandez, J., Mengual, E., Simoni, D. A., Royo, M., Egaña-Yin, D., Hertog, O. L. A., López-Ortiz, L., Muñoz-Tomás, A., Santiago-Martínez, P., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08188-2 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Omar, M., Nassar, S., Hijazi, K., Glicksberg, B. S., Nadkarni, G. N., & Klang, E. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109545 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery
Kuno, M., Osumi, H., Udagawa, S., Yoshikawa, K., Ooki, A., Shinozaki, E., Ishikawa, T., Oba, J., Yamaguchi, K., & Sakurada, K. (2025) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol32110588 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Pai, N. P., Rahimi, S. A., Tulsi, J., Bartlett, S., Grover, S., & Sejdic, E. (2026) · FACETS · doi:10.1139/facets-2025-0142 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Beam, A. L., Drazen, J. M., Kohane, I. S., Leong, T.-Y., Manrai, A. K., & Rubin, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2023-03-30
- Volume
- 388
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1220-1221
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4361284227
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL141771)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence in healthcare, clinical decision support, health care
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
