Cited by 205Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsInfant Development and Preterm Care

Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery

Open access
Iams, Jay D., Newman, Roger B., Thom, Elizabeth A., Goldenberg, Robert L., Mueller-Heubach, Eberhard, Moawad, Atef, Sibai, Baha M., Caritis, Steve N. +5 more·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The measurement of the frequency of uterine contractions has not been useful for reducing the rate of preterm delivery in randomized trials. Nonetheless, ambulatory monitoring of contractions continues to be used in clinical practice. METHODS: We assessed the frequency of uterine contractions as a predictor of the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery before 35 weeks of gestation. We enrolled women with singleton pregnancies between 22 and 24 weeks of gestation. The women used a contraction monitor at home to record contraction frequency twice daily on 2 or more days per week from enrollment to delivery or 37 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: We obtained 34,908 hours of successful monitoring recordings from 306 women. Although more contractions were recorded from women who delivered before 35 weeks than from women who delivered at 35 weeks or later, we could identify no threshold frequency that effectively identified women who delivered preterm infants. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of a maximal hourly frequency of contractions of four or more between 4 p.m. and 3:59 a.m. were 9 percent and 25 percent, respectively, at 22 to 24 weeks and 28 percent and 23 percent at 27 to 28 weeks. Other proposed screening tests, such as digital and ultrasound evaluations of the cervix and assays for fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions, also had low sensitivity and positive predictive value for preterm labor. CONCLUSIONS: Although the likelihood of preterm delivery increases with an increased frequency of uterine contractions, measurement of this frequency is not clinically useful for predicting preterm delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa002868

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uterine contraction frequency is associated with preterm birth, but contractions do not predict preterm birth well in singletons because of wide variation in normal pregnancy and large overlap between women who do and do not deliver preterm.

    “Several studies have shown an association between uterine contraction frequency and preterm birth;117, 118, 119 however, uterine contractions do not predict preterm birth well in singletons because of the wide variation in frequency in normal pregnancy and the large overlap in frequency between women who do and do not deliver preterm.119”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [119]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iams, J. D., Newman, R. B., Thom, E. A., Goldenberg, R. L., Mueller-Heubach, E., Moawad, A., Sibai, B. M., Caritis, S. N., Miodovnik, M., Paul, R. H., Dombrowski, M. P., Thurnau, G., & McNellis, D.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-01-24
Volume
346
Issue
4
Pages
250-255
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2066769587
Cited by
205
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u10hd027889-02)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD19897, HD27905, HD27917, HD27883, U10HD027861, HD-27915, HD21434, HD-21414, HD-27860, HD27861, U10HD027917, U10HD027905, U10HD027860, HD27869, [HD21410, HD27889, U01HD019897, U10HD027883)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
uterine contraction, contraction frequency, spontaneous preterm birth, preterm labor prediction, ambulatory monitoring, preterm birth screening, fetal fibronectin, cervical length, sensitivity and positive predictive value
MeSH terms
Cervix Uteri, Female, Fibronectins, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Risk, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Uterine Contraction, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Uterine Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review