The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Two Diets for the Prevention of Recurrent Stones in Idiopathic Hypercalciuria
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A low-calcium diet is recommended to prevent recurrent stones in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria, yet long-term data on the efficacy of a low-calcium diet are lacking. Recently, the efficacy of a low-calcium diet has been questioned, and greater emphasis has been placed on reducing the intake of animal protein and salt, but again, long-term data are unavailable. METHODS: We conducted a five-year randomized trial comparing the effect of two diets in 120 men with recurrent calcium oxalate stones and hypercalciuria. Sixty men were assigned to a diet containing a normal amount of calcium (30 mmol per day) but reduced amounts of animal protein (52 g per day) and salt (50 mmol of sodium chloride per day); the other 60 men were assigned to the traditional low-calcium diet, which contained 10 mmol of calcium per day. RESULTS: At five years, 12 of the 60 men on the normal-calcium, low-animal-protein, low-salt diet and 23 of the 60 men on the low-calcium diet had had relapses. The unadjusted relative risk of a recurrence for the group on the first diet, as compared with the group on the second diet, was 0.49 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.98; P=0.04). During follow-up, urinary calcium levels dropped significantly in both groups by approximately 170 mg per day (4.2 mmol per day). However, urinary oxalate excretion increased in the men on the low-calcium diet (by an average of 5.4 mg per day [60 micromol per day]) but decreased in those on the normal-calcium, low-animal-protein, low-salt diet (by an average of 7.2 mg per day [80 micromol per day]). CONCLUSIONS: In men with recurrent calcium oxalate stones and hypercalciuria, restricted intake of animal protein and salt, combined with a normal calcium intake, provides greater protection than the traditional low-calcium diet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taylor, E. N., Stampfer, M. J., & Curhan, G. C. (2004) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000146012.44570.20 · Cited by 497
Metabolic Evaluation and Recurrence Prevention for Urinary Stone Patients: EAU Guidelines
Skolarikos, A., Straub, M., Knoll, T., Sarica, K., Seitz, C., Petřík, A., & Türk, C. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.029 · Cited by 409
Calcium supplementation in clinical practice: a review of forms, doses, and indications
Straub, D. A. (2007) · Nutrition in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1177/0115426507022003286 · Cited by 374
Risk of Kidney Stones: Influence of Dietary Factors, Dietary Patterns, and Vegetarian–Vegan Diets
Ferraro, P. M., Bargagli, M., Trinchieri, A., & Gambaro, G. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030779 · Cited by 303
Comparative Effects of Low-Carbohydrate High-Protein Versus Low-Fat Diets on the Kidney
Friedman, A. N., Ogden, L. G., Foster, G. D., Klein, S., Stein, R., Miller, B., Hill, J. O., Brill, C., Bailer, B., Rosenbaum, D. R., et al. (2012) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.11741111 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Borghi, L., Schianchi, T., Meschi, T., Guerra, A., Allegri, F., Maggiore, U., & Novarini, A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-01-10
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-84
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2076550141
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Two Diets for the Prevention of Recurrent Stones in Idiopathic Hypercalciuria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa010369
- The paper
- Borghi, L., Schianchi, T., Meschi, T., Guerra, A., Allegri, F., Maggiore, U., & Novarini, A. (2002). Comparison of Two Diets for the Prevention of Recurrent Stones in Idiopathic Hypercalciuria. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa010369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.