The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Serologic Markers of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwanese Men
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is probable but unproven that Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has a role in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We determined whether antibodies against EBV are present before the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: A total of 9699 men were enrolled between 1984 and 1986. Blood samples were examined for IgA antibodies against EBV capsid antigen and neutralizing antibodies against EBV-specific DNase. During 131,981 person-years of follow-up, 22 pathologically confirmed new cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma that were diagnosed more than one year after recruitment were ascertained through linkage with the National Cancer Registry of Taiwan. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma per 100,000 person-years was 11.2 for subjects who tested positive for neither serologic marker, 45.0 for those who had one marker, and 371.0 for those who had both markers. After adjustment for age and the presence or absence of a family history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, the relative risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was 32.8 for subjects with both markers (95 percent confidence interval, 7.3 to 147.2; P<0.001) and 4.0 for subjects with one marker (95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 10.2; P=0.003), as compared with subjects with neither marker. The longer the duration of follow-up, the greater the difference in the cumulative incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma between seropositive and seronegative subjects. CONCLUSIONS: IgA antibodies against EBV capsid antigen and neutralizing antibodies against EBV DNase are predictive of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wei, W. I., & Sham, J. S. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66698-6 · Cited by 1,208
Levin, L. I. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.20.2496 · Cited by 448
Historical review of the causes of cancer
Blackadar, C. B. (2016) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.54 · Cited by 389
Chen, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-J., Tsai, W.-H., Ko, Y.-C., Chen, J.-Y., & Lin, S.-F. (2009) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.8.1.7411 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chien, Y.-C., Chen, J.-Y., Liu, M.-Y., Yang, H.-I., Hsu, M.-M., Chen, C.-J., & Yang, C.-S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2001-12-27
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1877-1882
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1994898506
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serologic Markers of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwanese Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa011610
- The paper
- Chien, Y.-C., Chen, J.-Y., Liu, M.-Y., Yang, H.-I., Hsu, M.-M., Chen, C.-J., & Yang, C.-S. (2001). Serologic Markers of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Taiwanese Men. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa011610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.