The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluconazole for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania major
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Whereas certain oral antifungal azoles are well documented to have activity against leishmania, data on the efficacy of fluconazole for leishmaniasis are limited. We conducted a controlled trial in Saudi Arabia of fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy of oral fluconazole, in a dose of 200 mg daily for six weeks, in the treatment of parasitologically confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis. The primary outcome measure was the time to the complete healing of all lesions. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were assigned to receive fluconazole, and 103 patients were assigned to receive placebo. Follow-up data were available for 80 and 65 patients, respectively. At the three-month follow-up, healing of lesions was complete for 63 of the 80 patients in the fluconazole group (79 percent) and 22 of the 65 patients in the placebo group (34 percent; relative risk of complete healing, 2.33 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.63 to 3.33]). According to an intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of healing were 59 percent and 22 percent, respectively (relative risk, 2.76 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.84 to 4.12]). Sodium stibogluconate was offered to 11 patients in the fluconazole group who returned for follow-up (14 percent) and 33 of those in the placebo group (51 percent) in whom oral treatment was judged to have failed. According to a Kaplan-Meier analysis, the time to healing was shorter for the fluconazole group (median, 8.5 weeks, as compared with 11.2 weeks in the placebo group; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). Side effects were mild and similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A six-week course of oral fluconazole is a safe and useful treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Murray, H. W., Berman, J. D., Davies, C. R., & Saravia, N. G. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67629-5 · Cited by 1,771
Aronson, N., Herwaldt, B. L., Libman, M., Pearson, R., Lopez-Velez, R., Weina, P., Carvalho, E. M., Ephros, M., Jeronimo, S., & Magill, A. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw670 · Cited by 458
An update on pharmacotherapy for leishmaniasis
Sundar, S., & Chakravarty, J. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.973850 · Cited by 320
Roberts, C. W., McLeod, R., Rice, D. W., Ginger, M., Chance, M. L., & Goad, L. J. (2003) · Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0166-6851(02)00280-3 · Cited by 296
Onyewu, C., Blankenship, J. R., Del Poeta, M., & Heitman, J. (2003) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.47.3.956-964.2003 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Alrajhi, A. A., Ibrahim, E. A., De Vol, E. B., Khairat, M., Faris, R. M., & Maguire, J. H.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-03-21
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 891-895
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2081586053
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluconazole for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania major. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa011882
- The paper
- Alrajhi, A. A., Ibrahim, E. A., De Vol, E. B., Khairat, M., Faris, R. M., & Maguire, J. H. (2002). Fluconazole for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Caused by Leishmania major. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa011882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.