The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of APC Mutations in Fecal DNA from Patients with Colorectal Tumors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive methods for detecting colorectal tumors have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality from this disease. The mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene that initiate colorectal tumors theoretically provide an optimal marker for detecting colorectal tumors. The purpose of our study was to determine the feasibility of detecting APC mutations in fecal DNA with the use of newly developed methods. METHODS: We purified DNA from routinely collected stool samples and screened for APC mutations with the use of a novel approach called digital protein truncation. Many different mutations could potentially be identified in a sensitive and specific manner with this technique. RESULTS: Stool samples from 28 patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancers, 18 patients with adenomas that were at least 1 cm in diameter, and 28 control patients without neoplastic disease were studied. APC mutations were identified in 26 of the 46 patients with neoplasia (57 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 41 to 71 percent) and in none of the 28 control patients (0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 12 percent; P<0.001). In the patients with positive tests, mutant APC genes made up 0.4 to 14.1 percent of all APC genes in the stool. CONCLUSIONS: APC mutations can be detected in fecal DNA from patients with relatively early colorectal tumors. This feasibility study suggests a new approach for the early detection of colorectal neoplasms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer
Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1 · Cited by 4,919
Self-citation
Cited by
WINAWER, S. (2003) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50044 · Cited by 2,143
Fecal DNA versus Fecal Occult Blood for Colorectal-Cancer Screening in an Average-Risk Population
Imperiale, T. F., Ransohoff, D. F., Itzkowitz, S. H., Turnbull, B. A., & Ross, M. E. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa033403 · Cited by 803
Emerging molecular markers of cancer
Sidransky, D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc755 · Cited by 662
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Scientific Review
Walsh, J. M. E., & Terdiman, J. P. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.10.1288 · Cited by 419
Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances
Lech, G. (2016) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1745 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Traverso, G., Shuber, A., Levin, B., Johnson, C., Olsson, L., Schoetz, D. J., Hamilton, S. R., Boynton, K., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-01-31
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 311-320
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2068380327
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of APC Mutations in Fecal DNA from Patients with Colorectal Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa012294
- The paper
- Traverso, G., Shuber, A., Levin, B., Johnson, C., Olsson, L., Schoetz, D. J., Hamilton, S. R., Boynton, K., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (2002). Detection of APC Mutations in Fecal DNA from Patients with Colorectal Tumors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa012294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.