The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Population-Based Comparison of Strategies to Prevent Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in Neonates
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Guidelines issued in 1996 in the United States recommend either screening of pregnant women for group B streptococcal colonization by means of cultures (screening approach) or assessing clinical risk factors (risk-based approach) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: In a multistate retrospective cohort study, we compared the effectiveness of the screening and risk-based approaches in preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease (in infants less than seven days old). We studied a stratified random sample of the 629,912 live births in 1998 and 1999 in eight geographical areas where there was active surveillance for group B streptococcal infection, including all births in which the neonate had early-onset disease. Women with no documented culture for group B streptococcus were considered to have been cared for according to the risk-based approach. RESULTS: We studied 5144 births, including 312 in which the newborn had early-onset group B streptococcal disease. Antenatal screening was documented for 52 percent of the mothers. The risk of early-onset disease was significantly lower among the infants of screened women than among those in the risk-based group (adjusted relative risk, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.60). Because women whose providers had no strategy for prophylaxis may have been misclassified in the risk-based group, we excluded all women with risk factors and adequate time for prophylaxis who did not receive antibiotics. The adjusted relative risk of early-onset disease associated with the screening approach in this secondary analysis was similar--0.48 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Routine screening for group B streptococcus during pregnancy prevents more cases of early-onset disease than the risk-based approach. Recommendations that endorse both strategies as equivalent warrant reconsideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edmond, K. M., Kortsalioudaki, C., Scott, S., Schrag, S. J., Zaidi, A. K., Cousens, S., & Heath, P. T. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61651-6 · Cited by 600
Self-citationPuopolo, K. M., Benitz, W. E., Zaoutis, T. E., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, Cummings, J., Juul, S., Hand, I., Eichenwald, E., Poindexter, B., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2894 · Cited by 459
Self-citationStatus of vaccine research and development of vaccines for GBS
Heath, P. T. (2016) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.072 · Cited by 152
Werner, E. F., Hauspurg, A. K., & Rouse, D. J. (2015) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000001115 · Cited by 113
Perinatal group B streptococcal disease
Heath, P. T., & Schuchat, A. (2007) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.01.003 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schrag, S. J., Zell, E. R., Lynfield, R., Roome, A., Arnold, K. E., Craig, A. S., Harrison, L. H., Reingold, A., Stefonek, K., Smith, G., Gamble, M., & Schuchat, A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-07-25
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 233-239
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1999988612
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Population-Based Comparison of Strategies to Prevent Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in Neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa020205
- The paper
- Schrag, S. J., Zell, E. R., Lynfield, R., Roome, A., Arnold, K. E., Craig, A. S., Harrison, L. H., Reingold, A., Stefonek, K., Smith, G., Gamble, M., & Schuchat, A. (2002). A Population-Based Comparison of Strategies to Prevent Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in Neonates. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.