The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Warfarin, Aspirin, or Both after Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction is well established. Although the available literature suggests that warfarin is superior to aspirin, aspirin is currently the more widely used drug. We studied the efficacy and safety of warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter trial in 3630 patients, 1216 received warfarin (in a dose intended to achieve an international normalized ratio [INR] of 2.8 to 4.2), 1206 received aspirin (160 mg daily), and 1208 received aspirin (75 mg daily) combined with warfarin (in a dose intended to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 2.5). The mean duration of observation was four years. RESULTS: The primary outcome, a composite of death, nonfatal reinfarction, or thromboembolic cerebral stroke, occurred in 241 of 1206 patients receiving aspirin (20.0 percent), 203 of 1216 receiving warfarin (16.7 percent; rate ratio as compared with aspirin, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.95; P=0.03), and 181 of 1208 receiving warfarin and aspirin (15.0 percent; rate ratio as compared with aspirin, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.83; P=0.001). The difference between the two groups receiving warfarin was not statistically significant. Episodes of major, nonfatal bleeding were observed in 0.62 percent of patients per treatment-year in both groups receiving warfarin and in 0.17 percent of patients receiving aspirin (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin, in combination with aspirin or given alone, was superior to aspirin alone in reducing the incidence of composite events after an acute myocardial infarction but was associated with a higher risk of bleeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiore, L. D., Ezekowitz, M. D., Brophy, M. T., Lu, D., Sacco, J., & Peduzzi, P. (2002) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc0502.103329 · Cited by 224
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1136/hrt.38.7.659 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0002-8703(77)80410-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/hrt.40.2.153 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM198010163031601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM199007193230302 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM198104023041401 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM198108063050601 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.222.5.541 · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90655-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1967.tb10881.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1969.tb01488.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1969.tb07299.x · DOI
- 1980, Lancet, 2, 989
- 1994, Lancet, 343, 499
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)92808-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0735-1097(86)80489-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71 · DOI · Paper page
- Breddin K, 1980, Haemostasis, 9, 325
- 10.1056/NEJM198209163071201 · DOI
- Julian DG, 1996, BMJ, 313, 1429, 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1429 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01180-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.282.21.2058 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00800.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03487-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11475-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2531897 · DOI
- 10.2307/2532736 · DOI
- 10.2307/2347988 · DOI · Paper page
- Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. Lyons, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980. (IARC scientific publications no. 32.)
- 1988, Lancet, 2, 349
Cited by
Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., Pogue, J., Reilly, P. A., Themeles, E., Varrone, J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0905561 · Cited by 11,215
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes
Knuuti, J., Wijns, W., Saraste, A., Capodanno, D., Barbato, E., Funck-Brentano, C., Prescott, E., Storey, R. F., Deaton, C., Cuisset, T., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 · Cited by 7,166
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170
Fuster, V., Rydén, L. E., Cannom, D. S., Crijns, H. J., Curtis, A. B., Ellenbogen, K. A., Halperin, J. L., Le Heuzey, J.-Y., Kay, G. N., Lowe, J. E., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.177292 · Cited by 2,805
Meschia, J. F., Bushnell, C., Boden-Albala, B., Braun, L. T., Bravata, D. M., Chaturvedi, S., Creager, M. A., Eckel, R. H., Elkind, M. S. V., Fornage, M., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000046 · Cited by 2,650
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurlen, M., Abdelnoor, M., Smith, P., Erikssen, J., & Arnesen, H.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-09-26
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 969-974
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2046051565
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Warfarin, Aspirin, or Both after Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa020496
- The paper
- Hurlen, M., Abdelnoor, M., Smith, P., Erikssen, J., & Arnesen, H. (2002). Warfarin, Aspirin, or Both after Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa020496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.