The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Oral Miltefosine for Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There are 500,000 cases per year of visceral leishmaniasis, which occurs primarily in the Indian subcontinent. Almost all untreated patients die, and all the effective agents have been parenteral. Miltefosine is an oral agent that has been shown in small numbers of patients to have a favorable therapeutic index for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. We performed a clinical trial in India comparing miltefosine with the most effective standard treatment, amphotericin B. METHODS: The study was a randomized, open-label comparison, in which 299 patients 12 years of age or older received orally administered miltefosine (50 or 100 mg [approximately 2.5 mg per kilogram of body weight] daily for 28 days) and 99 patients received intravenously administered amphotericin B (1 mg per kilogram every other day for a total of 15 injections). RESULTS: The groups were well matched in terms of age, weight, proportion with previous failure of treatment for leishmaniasis, parasitologic grade of splenic aspirate, and splenomegaly. At the end of treatment, splenic aspirates were obtained from 293 patients in the miltefosine group and 98 patients in the amphotericin B group. No parasites were identified, for an initial cure rate of 100 percent. By six months after the completion of treatment, 282 of the 299 patients in the miltefosine group (94 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 91 to 97]) and 96 of the 99 patients in the amphotericin B group (97 percent) had not had a relapse; these patients were classified as cured. Vomiting and diarrhea, generally lasting one to two days, occurred in 38 percent and 20 percent of the patients in the miltefosine group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral miltefosine is an effective and safe treatment for Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Miltefosine may be particularly advantageous because it can be administered orally. It may also be helpful in regions where parasites are resistant to current agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Murray, H. W., Berman, J. D., Davies, C. R., & Saravia, N. G. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67629-5 · Cited by 1,771
Self-citationSundar, S., Sinha, P. K., Rai, M., Verma, D. K., Nawin, K., Alam, S., Chakravarty, J., Vaillant, M., Verma, N., Pandey, K., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62050-8 · Cited by 337
Self-citationThe use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: A review
Dumville, J. C., Hahn, S., Miles, J. N. V., & Torgerson, D. J. (2006) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2005.08.003 · Cited by 320
Liposomal amphotericin B and leishmaniasis: Dose and response
Sundar, S., & Chakravarty, J. (2010) · Journal of Global Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4103/0974-777x.62886 · Cited by 217
Self-citationWall, G., Herrera, N., & Lopez-Ribot, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof5040092 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Sundar, S., Jha, T. K., Thakur, C. P., Engel, J., Sindermann, H., Fischer, C., Junge, K., Bryceson, A., & Berman, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2002-11-28
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1739-1746
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2016587111
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Miltefosine for Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa021556
- The paper
- Sundar, S., Jha, T. K., Thakur, C. P., Engel, J., Sindermann, H., Fischer, C., Junge, K., Bryceson, A., & Berman, J. (2002). Oral Miltefosine for Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa021556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.