Cited by 217Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesFungal Infections and StudiesLeprosy Research and Treatment

Liposomal amphotericin B and leishmaniasis: Dose and response

Open access
Sundar, Shyam, Chakravarty, Jaya·2010·Journal of Global Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Liposomal amphotericin B has been used with increasing frequency to treat visceral leishmaniasis (VL). It is the treatment of choice for immunocompetent patients in the Mediterranean region and the preferred drug for HIV/VL co-infection. Although there is a regional variation in the susceptibility of the parasite a total dose of 20 mg/kg is effective in immunocompetent patients. Randomized clinical trials of liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of HIV-VL coinfected patients is urgently needed to optimize treatment in this subset. With the availability of Liposomal amphotericin B at a preferential pricing in the endemic areas, short course combination therapy can become a viable alternative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0974-777x.62886

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One currently approved nano-system (an amphotericin B liposomal formulation) is not cost-effective in developing countries.

    “However, one currently approved nano-system (an amphotericin B liposomal formulation) is not cost-effective in developing countries 140 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundar, S., & Chakravarty, J.
Affiliations
Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Sundar, Shyam
Venue
Journal of Global Infectious Diseases
Published
2010
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
159
ISSN
0974-777X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090009771
Cited by
217
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Global Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P50AI074321, U19AI074321)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Leprosy Research and Treatment
Keywords
liposomal amphotericin B, visceral leishmaniasis, treatment dose, secondary prophylaxis, combination therapy, short-course treatment, drug sensitivity, immunocompetent patient, Mediterranean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review