The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Absence of Cross-Reactivity between Sulfonamide Antibiotics and Sulfonamide Nonantibiotics
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The safety of sulfonamide nonantibiotics is unclear in patients with prior allergic reactions to sulfonamide antibiotics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the General Practice Research Database in the United Kingdom, examining the risk of allergic reactions within 30 days after the receipt of a sulfonamide nonantibiotic. Patients with evidence of prior hypersensitivity after the receipt of a sulfonamide antibiotic were compared with those without such evidence. Similar analyses were also performed with the use of penicillins instead of sulfonamides, to determine whether any risk was specific to sulfonamide cross-reactivity. RESULTS: Of 969 patients with an allergic reaction after a sulfonamide antibiotic, 96 (9.9 percent) had an allergic reaction after subsequently receiving a sulfonamide nonantibiotic. Of 19,257 who had no allergic reaction after a sulfonamide antibiotic, 315 (1.6 percent) had an allergic reaction after receiving a sulfonamide nonantibiotic (adjusted odds ratio, 2.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 3.7). However, the risk of allergic reactions was even greater after the receipt of a penicillin among patients with a prior hypersensitivity reaction to a sulfonamide antibiotic, as compared with patients with no such history (adjusted odds ratio, 3.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.5 to 4.3). Furthermore, among those with a prior hypersensitivity reaction after the receipt of a sulfonamide antibiotic, the risk of an allergic reaction after the subsequent receipt of a sulfonamide nonantibiotic was lower than the risk of an allergic reaction after the subsequent receipt of a penicillin (adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.9). Finally, the risk of an allergic reaction after the receipt of a sulfonamide nonantibiotic was lower among patients with a history of hypersensitivity to sulfonamide antibiotics than among patients with a history of hypersensitivity to penicillins (adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between hypersensitivity after the receipt of sulfonamide antibiotics and a subsequent allergic reaction after the receipt of a sulfonamide nonantibiotic, but this association appears to be due to a predisposition to allergic reactions rather than to cross-reactivity with sulfonamide-based drugs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most of our allergy alerts were triggered by narcotic allergies, or by cross-reactions of unknown significance [29,30].”
From Drug interaction alert override rates in the Meaningful Use era: No evidence of progress (2014) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Simulation Study of Confounder-Selection Strategies
Maldonado, G., & Greenland, S. (1993) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813 · Cited by 2,491
Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis
Greenland, S. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.3.340 · Cited by 2,208
Best Subsets Logistic Regression
Hosmer, D. W., Jovanovic, B. D., & Lemeshow, S. A. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531779 · Cited by 1,175
Jick, H., Jick, S. S., & Derby, L. E. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6779.766 · Cited by 839
Bigby, M. E. (1986) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.256.24.3358 · Cited by 464
Venous leg ulcer: Incidence and prevalence in the elderly
Margolisa, B. D. J., Bilkerb, C. W., Santannab, C. J., & Baumgartenc, D. M. (2002) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2002.121739 · Cited by 461
Mauri-Hellweg, D., Bettens, F., Mauri, D., Brander, C., Hunziker, T., & Pichler, W. J. (1995) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.1.462 · Cited by 349
Studies on the Epidemiology of Adverse Drug Reactions
Smith, J. W., Johnson, J. E., & Cluff, L. E. (1966) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196605052741804 · Cited by 317
Jick, H., Terris, B. Z., Derby, L. E., & Jick, S. S. (1992) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.2630010607 · Cited by 265
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Greenberger PA. Drug allergy. B. Allergic reactions to individual drugs: low molecular weight. In: Grammer LC, Greenberger PA, eds. Patterson's allergic diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:335-59.
- Cribb AE, 1996, Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev, 15, 9
- Hoigne R, 1993, Monogr Allergy, 31, 147
- Enright T, 1989, Ann Allergy, 62, 302
- Hosoya T, 2000, Radiat Med, 18, 39
- Park J, 2000, Can J Clin Pharmacol, 7, 38
- Landor M, 1993, Ann Allergy, 70, 196
- Bretza JA, 1982, Wis Med J, 81, 21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drug Allergy: An Updated Practice Parameter
(2010) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002 · Cited by 982
Sicherer, S. H., & Sampson, H. A. (2006) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.048 · Cited by 647
Blumenthal, K. G., Peter, J. G., Trubiano, J. A., & Phillips, E. J. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32218-9 · Cited by 614
Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update
Khan, D. A., Banerji, A., Blumenthal, K. G., Phillips, E. J., Solensky, R., White, A. A., Bernstein, J. A., Chu, D. K., Ellis, A. K., Golden, D. B. K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028 · Cited by 607
Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus
CHENG, A. Y. Y. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031414 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Strom, B. L., Schinnar, R., Apter, A. J., Margolis, D. J., Lautenbach, E., Hennessy, S., Bilker, W. B., & Pettitt, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2003-10-23
- Volume
- 349
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1628-1635
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2099552063
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 12.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
- Keywords
- sulfonamide antibiotics, drug cross-reactivity, drug hypersensitivity, allergic reactions, penicillin allergy, general practice patients, drug allergy testing
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross Reactions, Diuretics, Drug Hypersensitivity, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Sulfonamides, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review