Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 Infection

Open access
Robbins, Gregory K., De Gruttola, Victor, Shafer, Robert W., Smeaton, Laura M., Snyder, Sally W., Pettinelli, Carla, Dubé, Michael P., Fischl, Margaret A., Pollard, Richard B., Delapenha, Robert, Gedeon, Linda, van der Horst, Charles, Murphy, Robert L., Becker, Mark I., D'Aquila, Richard T., Vella, Stefano, Merigan, Thomas C., Hirsch, Martin S.·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal sequencing of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is unknown. We compared several different antiretroviral treatment strategies. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind trial used a factorial design to compare pairs of sequential three-drug regimens, starting with a regimen including zidovudine and lamivudine or a regimen including didanosine and stavudine in combination with either nelfinavir or efavirenz. The primary end point was the length of time to the failure of the second three-drug regimen. RESULTS: A total of 620 subjects who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were followed for a median of 2.3 years. Starting with a three-drug regimen containing efavirenz combined with zidovudine and lamivudine (but not efavirenz combined with didanosine and stavudine) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with a regimen containing nelfinavir (hazard ratio for failure of the second regimen, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.06), as well as to delay the second virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.09), and significantly delayed the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.39) and the first virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.34). Starting with zidovudine and lamivudine combined with efavirenz (but not zidovudine and lamivudine combined with nelfinavir) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with didanosine and stavudine (hazard ratio, 0.68), and significantly delayed both the first and the second virologic failures (hazard ratio for the first virologic failure, 0.39; hazard ratio for the second virologic failure, 0.47), as well as the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.35). The initial use of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz resulted in a shorter time to viral suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of antiretroviral drugs depends on how they are combined. The combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz is superior to the other antiretroviral regimens used as initial therapy in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa030264

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Metadata

Authors
Robbins, G. K., De Gruttola, V., Shafer, R. W., Smeaton, L. M., Snyder, S. W., Pettinelli, C., Dubé, M. P., Fischl, M. A., Pollard, R. B., Delapenha, R., Gedeon, L., van der Horst, C., Murphy, R. L., Becker, M. I., D'Aquila, R. T., Vella, S., Merigan, T. C., & Hirsch, M. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-12-11
Volume
349
Issue
24
Pages
2293-2303
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2015796602
Cited by
351
References
21
FWCI
24.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa030264
The paper
Robbins, G. K., De Gruttola, V., Shafer, R. W., Smeaton, L. M., Snyder, S. W., Pettinelli, C., Dubé, M. P., Fischl, M. A., Pollard, R. B., Delapenha, R., Gedeon, L., van der Horst, C., Murphy, R. L., Becker, M. I., D'Aquila, R. T., Vella, S., Merigan, T. C., & Hirsch, M. S. (2003). Comparison of Sequential Three-Drug Regimens as Initial Therapy for HIV-1 Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa030264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.