Cited by 121HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy and continuity of HIV care: the impact of incarceration and prison release on adherence and HIV treatment outcomes

Open access
Palepu, Anita, Tyndall, Mark W, Chan, Keith, Wood, Evan, Montaner, Julio SG, Hogg, Robert S·2004·Antiviral Therapy

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of incarceration within 12 months of initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on non-adherence and HIV-1 RNA suppression. Methods: We compared the adherence and virological outcomes among participants in a population-based HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program in British Columbia, Canada, by history of incarceration in a provincial prison. Participants who were HIV-infected, naive to HAART and who were prescribed treatment between 1 July 1997 and 1 March 2002 were eligible for this study. Logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with non-adherence and Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine the factors associated with HIV-1 RNA suppression adjusting for age, gender, history of drug use, baseline HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4 cell count, type of antiretroviral regimen [two nucleosides + protease inhibitor (PI) vs two nucleosides + non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)], physician's HIV-related experience for each subject and adherence as measured by pharmacy refill compliance. Results: There were 1746 subjects (101 incarcerated/ 1645 non-incarcerated) who started antiretroviral therapy between 1 July 1997 and 1 March 2002. Of those incarcerated, 50 initiated HAART while in prison and 27 subjects were released but returned to prison in the follow-up period. Subjects received antiretroviral therapy while incarcerated for a median number of 4 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2–10]. Multiple logistic regression results showed that a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART independently increased the odds of non-adherence [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.40; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.54–3.75]. A history of injected drug use was also associated with non-adherence (AOR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.17–1.90). The following factors were negatively associated with non-adherence: older age (AOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72–0.91), male sex (AOR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38–0.65) and higher physician HIV-related experience (AOR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96–0.98). In addition, a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART reduced the odds of achieving HIV-1 RNA suppression [adjusted hazards ratio (AHR): 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51–0.89]. Other factors negatively associated with viral suppression included a history of drug injection (AHR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69–0.91), two nucleosides + PI vs two nucleosides + NNRTI (AHR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69–0.87), higher baseline HIV-1 RNA (AHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.62–0.70). Higher adherence was positively associated with viral suppression (AHR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.34–1.42). Among the 101 subjects who were incarcerated in the first year of starting HAART, the time spent in jail was positively associated with HIV-1 RNA suppression (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.10). Conclusion: HIV-infected subjects with a history of incarceration within 12 months of initiating HAART have higher odds of non-adherence and, consequently, lower probability of achieving HIV-1 RNA suppression. The longer their sentence, however, the higher the probability of virological suppression. The British Columbian provincial prison system provided a structured setting for HAART but subjects are unable to continue this level of adherence upon release. Strategies to ensure continuation of HIV/AIDS care for HIV-infected individuals leaving the criminal justice system must be a public health priority.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/135965350400900503

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incarceration and any exposure to the criminal legal system is deleterious to individual health.

    “Mounting evidence finds that incarceration – indeed, any exposure to the criminal legal system – is deleterious to individual, family, and community health.”

    From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Conclusions (page not specified) report that, among HIV-infected people starting HAART, a history of incarceration was associated with poorer adherence and a lower probability of viral suppression, particularly after release. The paper does not establish that any exposure to the criminal legal system harms individual health generally; it also describes incarceration as a probable marker of life instability rather than establishing it as the cause. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 121

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Hogg RS, Yip B, Kully C, Craib KJ, O'Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT & Montaner JS. Improved survival among HIV-infected patients after initiation of triple-drug anti- retroviral regimens. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999; 160:659-665.
  2. Revicki DA, Moyle G, Stellbrink HJ & Barker C. Quality of life outcomes of combination zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, and saquinavir-zalcitabine- zidovudine therapy for HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 per cubic millimeter. PISCES (SV14604) Study Group. AIDS 1999; 13:851-858.
  3. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, Aschman DJ & Holmberg SD. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine 1998; 338:853-860.
  4. Paterson DL, Swindells S, Mohr J, Brester M, Vergis EN, Squier C, Wagener MM & Singh N. Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infec- tion. Annals of Internal Medicine 2000; 133:21-30.
  5. Lucas GM, Cheever LW, Chaisson RE & Moore RD. Detrimental effects of continued illicit drug use on the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2001; 27:251-259.
  6. Spaulding A, Stephenson B, Macalino G, Ruby W, Clarke JG & Flanigan TP. Human immunodeficiency virus in correctional facilities: a review. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 35:305-312.
  7. Sabin KM, Frey RL, Horsley R & Greby SM. Characteristics and trends of newly identified HIV infec- tions among incarcerated populations: CDC HIV voluntary counseling, testing, and referral system, 1992-1998. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2001; 78:241-255.
  8. Kirkland LR, Fischl MA, Tashima KT, Paar D, Gensler T, Graham NM, Gao H, Rosenzweig JR, McClernon DR, Pittman G, Hessenthaler SM & Hernandez JE; NZTA4007 Study Team. Response to lamivudine-zidovudine plus abacavir twice daily in antiretroviral-naive, incarcerated patients with HIV infection taking directly observed treat- ment. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 34:511-518.
  9. Maruschak LM: Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin: HIV in prisons and jails, 1999. Document NCJ 187456, 2001.
  10. Hammett TM, Harmon P & Rhodes W. The burden of infectious disease among inmates of and releasees from US correctional facilities. American Journal of Public Health 2002; 92:1789-1794.
  11. Rich JD, Holmes L, Salas C, Macalino G, Davis D, Ryczek J & Flanigan T. Successful linkage of medical care and community services for HIV-positive offenders being released from prison. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2001; 78:279-289.
  12. Carpenter CC, Cooper DA, Fischl MA, Gatell JM, Gazzard BG, Hammer SM, Hirsch MS, Jacobsen DM, Katzenstein DA, Montaner JS, Richman DD, Saag MS, Schechter M, Schooley RT, Thompson MA, Vella S, Yeni PG & Volberding PA. Antiretroviral therapy in adults: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 283:381-390.
  13. Palepu A, Tyndall M, Yip B, O'Shaughnessy MV, Hogg RS & Montaner JSG. Impaired virologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy associated with ongoing injec- tion drug use. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2003; 32:522-526.
  14. Hogg RS, Heath K, Bangsberg D, Yip B, Press N, O'Shaughnessy MV & Montaner JS. Intermittent use of triple-combination therapy is predictive of mortality at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. AIDS 2002; 16:1051-1058.
  15. Wood E, Hogg RS, Yip B, Harrigan PR, O'Shaughnessy MV & Montaner JS. Effect of medication adherence on A Palepu et al. survival of HIV-infected adults who start highly active anti- retroviral therapy when the CD4+ cell count is 0.200 to 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003; 139:810-816.
  16. Lines R. Action on HIV/AIDS: Too Little, Too Late: A Report Card. 2002; pp. 31-33. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network.
  17. Stenzel MS, McKenzie M, Mitty JA & Flanigan TP. Enhancing adherence to HAART: a pilot program of modi- fied directly observed therapy. The AIDS Reader 2001; 11:317-328.
  18. Altice FL, Mostashari F & Friedland GH. Trust and the acceptance of and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2001; 28:47-58.
  19. Bangsberg DR, Mundy LM & Tulsky JP. Expanding directly observed therapy: tuberculosis to human immunodeficiency virus. American Journal of Medicine 2001; 110:664-666.
  20. Mitty JA, Stone VE, Sands M, Macalino G & Flanigan T. Directly observed therapy for the treatment of people with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a work in progress. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 34:984-990.
  21. Baillargeon J, Borucki MJ, Zepeda S, Jenson HB & Leach CT. Antiretroviral prescribing patterns in the Texas prison system. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000; 31:1476-1481.
  22. White MC, Mehrotra A, Menendez E, Estes M, Goldenson J & Tulsky JP. Jail inmates and HIV care: provision of antiretroviral therapy and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2001; 12:380-385.
  23. Kim JY, Rich J, Zierler S, Lourie K, Vigilante K, Normandie L, Snead M, Renzi J, Bury-Maynard D, Loberti P, Richman R & Flanigan TP. Successful commu- nity follow-up and reduced recidivism of HIV positive women prisoners. Journal of Correctional Health Care 1997; 4:5-17.
  24. Moatti JP, Carrieri MP, Spire B, Gastaut JA, Cassuto JP & Moreau J. Adherence to HAART in French HIV-infected injecting drug users: the contribution of buprenorphine drug maintenance treatment. The MANIF 2000 study group. AIDS 2000; 14:151-155.
  25. Lucas GM, Gebo KA, Chaisson RE & Moore RD. Longitudinal assessment of the effects of drug and alcohol abuse on HIV-1 treatment outcomes in an urban clinic. AIDS 2002; 16:767-774.
  26. Lucas GM, Chaisson RE & Moore RD. Highly active anti- retroviral therapy in a large urban clinic: risk factors for virologic failure and adverse drug reactions. Annals of Internal Medicine 1999; 131:81-87.
  27. Arnsten JH, Demas PA, Farzadegan H, Grant RW, Gourevitch MN, Chang CJ, Buono D, Eckholdt H, Howard AA & Schoenbaum EE. Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001; 33:1417-1423.
  28. Matthews GV, Sabin CA, Mandalia S, Lampe F, Phillips AN, Nelson MR, Bower M, Johnson MA & Gazzard BG. Virological suppression at 6 months is related to choice of initial regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients: a cohort study. AIDS 2002; 16:53-61.
  29. Torre D, Tambini R & Speranza F. Nevirapine or efavirenz combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors compared to HAART: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. HIV Clinical Trials 2001; 2:113-121.
  30. Ghani AC, Henley WE, Donnelly CA, Mayer S & Anderson RM. Comparison of the effectiveness of non- nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing and protease inhibitor-containing regimens using observational databases. AIDS 2001; 15:1133-1142.
  31. Zaccarelli M, Barracchini A, De Longis P, Perno CF, Soldani F, Liuzzi G, Serraino D, Ippolito G & Antinori A. Factors related to virologic failure among HIV-positive injecting drug users treated with combination antiretroviral therapy including two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and nevirapine. AIDS Patient Care & STDs 2002; 16:67-73.
  32. Wood E HR, Heath KV, De La Rosa R, Lee N, Yip B, O'Shaughnessy MV & Montaner JS. Provider bias in the selection of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy and HIV treatment outcomes in observational studies. AIDS 2003; 17:2629-2634.
  33. Shafer RW, Smeaton LM, Robbins GK, De Gruttola V, Snyder SW, D'Aquila RT, Johnson VA, Morse GD, Nokta MA, Martinez AI, Gripshover BM, Kaul P, Haubrich R, Swingle M, McCarty SD, Vella S, Hirsch MS & Merigan TC; AIDS Clinical Trials Group 384 Team. Comparison of four-drug regimens and pairs of sequential three-drug regi- mens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 349:2304-2315.
  34. Robbins GK, De Gruttola V, Shafer RW, Smeaton LM, Snyder SW, Pettinelli C, Dube MP, Fischl MA, Pollard RB, Delapenha R, Gedeon L, van der Horst C, Murphy RL, Becker MI, D'Aquila RT, Vella S, Merigan TC & Hirsch MS; AIDS Clinical Trials Group 384 Team. Comparison of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 349:2293-2303.
  35. Havlir DV, Bassett R, Levitan D, Gilbert P, Tebas P, Collier AC, Hirsch MS, Ignacio C, Condra J, Gunthard HF, Richman DD & Wong JK. Prevalence and predictive value of intermittent viremia with combination HIV therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001; 286:171-179. Incarceration and antiretroviral therapy Received 23 January 2004, accepted 14 April 2004

Authors
Palepu, A., Tyndall, M. W., Chan, K., Wood, E., Montaner, J. S., & Hogg, R. S.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Antiviral Therapy
Published
2004-07
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
713-719
ISSN
  • 1359-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-2058
OpenAlex
W69587150
Cited by
121
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antiviral Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, British Columbia
  • Health Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
HIV, incarceration, prisoner release, antiretroviral therapy initiation, medication adherence, HIV-1 RNA suppression, continuity of care, protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, HIV treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Prisons, RNA, Viral, HIV Infections, Substance Abuse, Intravenous, Treatment Outcome, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review