Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 818

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Uracil–Tegafur for Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

Open access
Kato, Harubumi, Ichinose, Yukito, Ohta, Morio, Hata, Enjo, Tsubota, Noriaki, Tada, Hirohito, Watanabe, Yoh, Wada, Hiromi, Tsuboi, Masahiro, Hamajima, Nobuyuki, Ohta, Mitsuo·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase 3 trial of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of non-small-cell lung cancer, a combination of uracil and tegafur (often referred to as UFT) taken orally was shown to prolong survival. A subgroup analysis disclosed that most patients who benefited had pathological stage I adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with completely resected pathological stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung to receive either oral uracil-tegafur (250 mg of tegafur per square meter of body-surface area per day) for two years or no treatment. Randomization was performed with stratification according to the pathological tumor category (T1 vs. T2), sex, and age. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: From January 1994 through March 1997, 999 patients were enrolled. Twenty patients were found to be ineligible and were excluded from the analysis after randomization; 491 patients were assigned to receive uracil-tegafur and 488 were assigned to observation. The median duration of follow-up for surviving patients was 73 months. The difference in overall survival between the two groups was statistically significant in favor of the uracil-tegafur group (P=0.04 by a stratified log-rank test). Grade 3 toxic effects occurred in 10 of the 482 patients (2 percent) who actually received uracil-tegafur. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur improves survival among patients with completely resected pathological stage I adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa032792

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 818

Metadata

Authors
Kato, H., Ichinose, Y., Ohta, M., Hata, E., Tsubota, N., Tada, H., Watanabe, Y., Wada, H., Tsuboi, M., Hamajima, N., & Ohta, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-04-22
Volume
350
Issue
17
Pages
1713-1721
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2075549113
Cited by
818
References
1
FWCI
59.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Uracil–Tegafur for Adenocarcinoma of the Lung. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa032792
The paper
Kato, H., Ichinose, Y., Ohta, M., Hata, E., Tsubota, N., Tada, H., Watanabe, Y., Wada, H., Tsuboi, M., Hamajima, N., & Ohta, M. (2004). A Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Uracil–Tegafur for Adenocarcinoma of the Lung. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa032792

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.