Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clopidogrel versus Aspirin and Esomeprazole to Prevent Recurrent Ulcer Bleeding

Open access
Chan, Francis K.L., Ching, Jessica Y.L., Hung, Lawrence C.T., Wong, Vincent W.S., Leung, Vincent K.S., Kung, Nelson N.S., Hui, Aric J., Wu, Justin C.Y., Leung, Wai K., Lee, Vivian W.Y., Lee, Kenneth K.C., Lee, Yuk T., Lau, James Y.W., To, Ka F., Chan, Henry L.Y., Chung, S.C. Sydney, Sung, Joseph J.Y.·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concurrent therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor is a standard treatment for patients receiving aspirin who are at risk for ulcer. Current U.S. guidelines also recommend clopidrogel for patients who have major gastrointestinal intolerance of aspirin. We compared clopidogrel with aspirin plus esomeprazole for the prevention of recurrent bleeding from ulcers in high-risk patients. METHODS: We studied patients who took aspirin to prevent vascular diseases and who presented with ulcer bleeding. After the ulcers had healed, we randomly assigned patients who were negative for Helicobacter pylori to receive either 75 mg of clopidogrel daily plus esomeprazole placebo twice daily or 80 mg of aspirin daily plus 20 mg of esomeprazole twice daily for 12 months. The end point was recurrent ulcer bleeding. RESULTS: We enrolled 320 patients (161 patients assigned to receive clopidogrel and 159 to receive aspirin plus esomeprazole). Recurrent ulcer bleeding occurred in 13 patients receiving clopidogrel and 1 receiving aspirin plus esomeprazole. The cumulative incidence of recurrent bleeding during the 12-month period was 8.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4.1 to 13.1 percent) among patients who received clopidogrel and 0.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 2.0 percent) among those who received aspirin plus esomeprazole (difference, 7.9 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval for the difference, 3.4 to 12.4; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a history of aspirin-induced ulcer bleeding whose ulcers had healed before they received the study treatment, aspirin plus esomeprazole was superior to clopidogrel in the prevention of recurrent ulcer bleeding. Our finding does not support the current recommendation that patients with major gastrointestinal intolerance of aspirin be given clopidogrel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa042087

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 629

Metadata

Authors
Chan, F. K. L., Ching, J. Y. L., Hung, L. C. T., Wong, V. W. S., Leung, V. K. S., Kung, N. N. S., Hui, A. J., Wu, J. C. Y., Leung, W. K., Lee, V. W. Y., Lee, K. K. C., Lee, Y. T., Lau, J. Y. W., To, K. F., Chan, H. L. Y., Chung, S. C. S., & Sung, J. J. Y.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-01-20
Volume
352
Issue
3
Pages
238-244
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2161254333
Cited by
629
References
2
FWCI
39.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin and Esomeprazole to Prevent Recurrent Ulcer Bleeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa042087
The paper
Chan, F. K. L., Ching, J. Y. L., Hung, L. C. T., Wong, V. W. S., Leung, V. K. S., Kung, N. N. S., Hui, A. J., Wu, J. C. Y., Leung, W. K., Lee, V. W. Y., Lee, K. K. C., Lee, Y. T., Lau, J. Y. W., To, K. F., Chan, H. L. Y., Chung, S. C. S., & Sung, J. J. Y. (2005). Clopidogrel versus Aspirin and Esomeprazole to Prevent Recurrent Ulcer Bleeding. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa042087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.