Cited by 1,099Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes

Open access
Keymeulen, Bart, Vandemeulebroucke, Evy, Ziegler, Anette G., Mathieu, Chantal, Kaufman, Leonard, Hale, Geoff, Gorus, Frans, Goldman, Michel +17 more·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease that leads to a major loss of insulin-secreting beta cells. The further decline of beta-cell function after clinical onset might be prevented by treatment with CD3 monoclonal antibodies, as suggested by the results of a phase 1 study. To provide proof of this therapeutic principle at the metabolic level, we initiated a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial with a humanized antibody, an aglycosylated human IgG1 antibody directed against CD3 (ChAglyCD3). METHODS: In a multicenter study, 80 patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive placebo or ChAglyCD3 for six consecutive days. Patients were followed for 18 months, during which their daily insulin needs and residual beta-cell function were assessed according to glucose-clamp-induced C-peptide release before and after the administration of glucagon. RESULTS: At 6, 12, and 18 months, residual beta-cell function was better maintained with ChAglyCD3 than with placebo. The insulin dose increased in the placebo group but not in the ChAglyCD3 group. This effect of ChAglyCD3 was most pronounced among patients with initial residual beta-cell function at or above the 50th percentile of the 80 patients. In this subgroup, the mean insulin dose at 18 months was 0.22 IU per kilogram of body weight per day with ChAglyCD3, as compared with 0.61 IU per kilogram with placebo (P<0.001). In this subgroup, 12 of 16 patients who received ChAglyCD3 (75 percent) received minimal doses of insulin (< or =0.25 IU per kilogram per day) as compared with none of the 21 patients who received placebo. Administration of ChAglyCD3 was associated with a moderate "flu-like" syndrome and transient symptoms of Epstein-Barr viral mononucleosis. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with CD3 antibody preserves residual beta-cell function for at least 18 months in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa043980

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The drug categories that preserve C-peptide include rituximab, teplizumab, otelixizumab, abatacept, and alefacept.

    “These drugs include a monoclonal antibody against the B-cell CD20 receptor (rituximab),147 monoclonal antibodies against the T-cell CD3 receptor (teplizumab148,149 and otelixizumab150), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA4)-immunoglobulin-mediated co-stimulatory blockade with abatacept,151 and alefacept,152”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [150]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 1,099

Authors
Keymeulen, B., Vandemeulebroucke, E., Ziegler, A. G., Mathieu, C., Kaufman, L., Hale, G., Gorus, F., Goldman, M., Walter, M., Candon, S., Schandene, L., Crenier, L., De Block, C., Seigneurin, J.-M., De Pauw, P., Pierard, D., Weets, I., Rebello, P., Bird, P., Berrie, E., Frewin, M., Waldmann, H., Bach, J.-F., Pipeleers, D., & Chatenoud, L.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • München Klinik Schwabing (DE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
  • Hôpital Albert Michallon (FR)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-06-23
Volume
352
Issue
25
Pages
2598-2608
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2149513114
Cited by
1,099
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 89 · 2012: 76
FWCI
43.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, new-onset diabetes, residual beta-cell function, insulin dose, beta-cell preservation, T cell-mediated autoimmunity, C-peptide, glucagon stimulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autoantibodies, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Herpesviridae, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin G, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Glucose Clamp Technique, CD3 Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review