Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 890

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) for Adults with Severe Sepsis and a Low Risk of Death

Open access
Abraham, Edward, Laterre, Pierre-François, Garg, Rekha, Levy, Howard, Talwar, Deepak, Trzaskoma, Benjamin L., François, Bruno, Guy, Jeffrey S., Brückmann, Martina, Rea-Neto, Álvaro, Rossaint, Rolf, Perrotin, Dominique, Sablotzki, Armin, Arkins, Nancy, Utterback, Barbara G., Macias, William L.·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In November 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) for adults who had severe sepsis and a high risk of death. The FDA required a study to evaluate the efficacy of DrotAA for adults who had severe sepsis and a low risk of death. METHODS: We randomly assigned adult patients with severe sepsis and a low risk of death (defined by an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE II] score <25 or single-organ failure) to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or DrotAA (24 microg per kilogram of body weight per hour) for 96 hours in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The prospectively defined primary end point was death from any cause and was assessed 28 days after the start of the infusion. In-hospital mortality within 90 days after the start of the infusion was measured, and safety information was collected. RESULTS: Enrollment in the trial was terminated early because of a low likelihood of meeting the prospectively defined objective of demonstrating a significant reduction in the 28-day mortality rate with the use of DrotAA. The study enrolled 2640 patients and collected data on 2613 (1297 in the placebo group and 1316 in the DrotAA group) at the 28-day follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between the placebo group and the DrotAA group in 28-day mortality (17.0 percent in the placebo group vs. 18.5 percent in the DrotAA group; P=0.34; relative risk, 1.08; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.28) or in in-hospital mortality (20.5 percent vs. 20.6 percent; P=0.98; relative risk, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.16). The rate of serious bleeding was greater in the DrotAA group than in the placebo group during both the infusion (2.4 percent vs. 1.2 percent, P=0.02) and the 28-day study period (3.9 percent vs. 2.2 percent, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of a beneficial treatment effect, coupled with an increased incidence of serious bleeding complications, indicates that DrotAA should not be used in patients with severe sepsis who are at low risk for death, such as those with single-organ failure or an APACHE II score less than 25.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa050935

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 890

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, E., Laterre, P.-F., Garg, R., Levy, H., Talwar, D., Trzaskoma, B. L., François, B., Guy, J. S., Brückmann, M., Rea-Neto, Á., Rossaint, R., Perrotin, D., Sablotzki, A., Arkins, N., Utterback, B. G., & Macias, W. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-09-29
Volume
353
Issue
13
Pages
1332-1341
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2154611259
Cited by
890
References
19
FWCI
68.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) for Adults with Severe Sepsis and a Low Risk of Death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa050935
The paper
Abraham, E., Laterre, P.-F., Garg, R., Levy, H., Talwar, D., Trzaskoma, B. L., François, B., Guy, J. S., Brückmann, M., Rea-Neto, Á., Rossaint, R., Perrotin, D., Sablotzki, A., Arkins, N., Utterback, B. G., & Macias, W. L. (2005). Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) for Adults with Severe Sepsis and a Low Risk of Death. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa050935

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.