Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 976

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circumferential Pulmonary-Vein Ablation for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Oral, Hakan, Pappone, Carlo, Chugh, Aman, Good, Eric, Bogun, Frank, Pelosi, Frank, Bates, Eric R., Lehmann, Michael H., Vicedomini, Gabriele, Augello, Giuseppe, Agricola, Eustachio, Sala, Simone, Santinelli, Vincenzo, Morady, Fred·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with a mean (+/-SD) age of 57+/-9 years who had chronic atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone and undergo two cardioversions during the first three months alone (the control group) or in combination with circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Cardiac rhythm was assessed with daily telephonic transmissions for one year. The left atrial diameter and the severity of symptoms were assessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 77 patients assigned to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation, ablation was repeated because of recurrent atrial fibrillation in 26 percent of patients and atypical atrial flutter in 6 percent. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that 74 percent of patients in the ablation group and 58 percent of those in the control group were free of recurrent atrial fibrillation or flutter without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy at one year (P=0.05). Among the 69 patients in the control group, 53 (77 percent) crossed over to undergo circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation by one year and only 3 (4 percent) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic-drug therapy or ablation. There were significant decreases in the left atrial diameter (12+/-11 percent, P<0.001) and the symptom severity score (59+/-21 percent, P<0.001) among patients who remained in sinus rhythm after circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. Except for atypical atrial flutter, there were no complications attributable to circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus rhythm can be maintained long term in the majority of patients with chronic atrial fibrillation by means of circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation independently of the effects of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy, cardioversion, or both. The maintenance of sinus rhythm is associated with a significant decrease in both the severity of symptoms and the left atrial diameter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa050955

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 976

Metadata

Authors
Oral, H., Pappone, C., Chugh, A., Good, E., Bogun, F., Pelosi, F., Bates, E. R., Lehmann, M. H., Vicedomini, G., Augello, G., Agricola, E., Sala, S., Santinelli, V., & Morady, F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-03-02
Volume
354
Issue
9
Pages
934-941
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2041743622
Cited by
976
References
1
FWCI
72.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circumferential Pulmonary-Vein Ablation for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa050955
The paper
Oral, H., Pappone, C., Chugh, A., Good, E., Bogun, F., Pelosi, F., Bates, E. R., Lehmann, M. H., Vicedomini, G., Augello, G., Agricola, E., Sala, S., Santinelli, V., & Morady, F. (2006). Circumferential Pulmonary-Vein Ablation for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa050955

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.