Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,873

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety and Efficacy of a Pentavalent Human–Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine

Open access
Vesikari, Timo, Matson, David O., Dennehy, Penelope, Van Damme, Pierre, Santosham, Mathuram, Rodriguez, Zoe, Dallas, Michael J., Heyse, Joseph F., Goveia, Michelle G., Black, Steven B., Shinefield, Henry R., Christie, Celia D.C., Ylitalo, Samuli, Itzler, Robbin F., Coia, Michele L., Onorato, Matthew T., Adeyi, Ben A., Marshall, Gary S., Gothefors, Leif, Campens, Dirk, Karvonen, Aino, Watt, James P., O'Brien, Katherine L., DiNubile, Mark J., Clark, H Fred, Boslego, John W., Offit, Paul A., Heaton, Penny M.·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is a leading cause of childhood gastroenteritis and death worldwide. METHODS: We studied healthy infants approximately 6 to 12 weeks old who were randomly assigned to receive three oral doses of live pentavalent human-bovine (WC3 strain) reassortant rotavirus vaccine containing human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4, and P[8] or placebo at 4-to-10-week intervals in a blinded fashion. Active surveillance was used to identify subjects with serious adverse and other events. RESULTS: The 34,035 infants in the vaccine group and 34,003 in the placebo group were monitored for serious adverse events. Intussusception occurred in 12 vaccine recipients and 15 placebo recipients within one year after the first dose including six vaccine recipients and five placebo recipients within 42 days after any dose (relative risk, 1.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 6.4). The vaccine reduced hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to G1-G4 rotavirus gastroenteritis occurring 14 or more days after the third dose by 94.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 91.2 to 96.6 percent). In a nested substudy, efficacy against any G1-G4 rotavirus gastroenteritis through the first full rotavirus season after vaccination was 74.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 66.8 to 79.9 percent); efficacy against severe gastroenteritis was 98.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88.3 to 100 percent). The vaccine reduced clinic visits for G1-G4 rotavirus gastroenteritis by 86.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 73.9 to 92.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: This vaccine was efficacious in preventing rotavirus gastroenteritis, decreasing severe disease and health care contacts. The risk of intussusception was similar in vaccine and placebo recipients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00090233.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa052664

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,873

Metadata

Authors
Vesikari, T., Matson, D. O., Dennehy, P., Van Damme, P., Santosham, M., Rodriguez, Z., Dallas, M. J., Heyse, J. F., Goveia, M. G., Black, S. B., Shinefield, H. R., Christie, C. D. C., Ylitalo, S., Itzler, R. F., Coia, M. L., Onorato, M. T., Adeyi, B. A., Marshall, G. S., Gothefors, L., Campens, D., Karvonen, A., Watt, J. P., O'Brien, K. L., DiNubile, M. J., Clark, H. F., Boslego, J. W., Offit, P. A., & Heaton, P. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-01-05
Volume
354
Issue
1
Pages
23-33
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143233237
Cited by
1,873
References
0
FWCI
99.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and Efficacy of a Pentavalent Human–Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa052664
The paper
Vesikari, T., Matson, D. O., Dennehy, P., Van Damme, P., Santosham, M., Rodriguez, Z., Dallas, M. J., Heyse, J. F., Goveia, M. G., Black, S. B., Shinefield, H. R., Christie, C. D. C., Ylitalo, S., Itzler, R. F., Coia, M. L., Onorato, M. T., Adeyi, B. A., Marshall, G. S., Gothefors, L., . . . Heaton, P. M. (2006). Safety and Efficacy of a Pentavalent Human–Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa052664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.