Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors

Open access
Remuzzi, Giuseppe, Cravedi, Paolo, Perna, Annalisa, Dimitrov, Borislav D., Turturro, Marta, Locatelli, Giuseppe, Rigotti, Paolo, Baldan, Nicola, Beatini, Marco, Valente, Umberto, Scalamogna, Mario, Ruggenenti, Piero·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival of kidney grafts from older donors is inferior to that of grafts from younger donors. We sought to determine whether selecting older kidneys according to their histologic characteristics before implantation would positively influence long-term outcome. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we assessed outcomes among 62 patients who received one or two histologically evaluated kidneys from donors older than 60 years of age. These outcomes were compared with outcomes among 248 matched recipients of single kidney grafts that had not been histologically evaluated and were either from donors 60 years of age or younger (124 positive-reference recipients who, according to available data, were expected to have an optimal outcome) or from those older than 60 years (124 negative-reference recipients, expected to have a worse outcome). The primary end point was graft survival. RESULTS: During a median period of 23 months, 4 recipients (6 percent) of histologically evaluated kidneys progressed to dialysis, as compared with 7 positive-reference recipients (6 percent) and 29 negative-reference recipients (23 percent). Graft survival in recipients of histologically evaluated kidneys did not differ significantly from that of grafts in positive-reference recipients but was superior to that of grafts in negative-reference recipients (hazard ratio for graft failure in the negative-reference recipients relative to the recipients of histologically evaluated kidneys, 3.68; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.29 to 10.52; P=0.02). The performance of preimplantation histologic evaluation predicted better survival both in the whole study group (P=0.02) and among recipients of kidneys from older donors (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survival of single or dual kidney grafts from donors older than 60 years of age is excellent, provided that the grafts are evaluated histologically before implantation. This approach may help to expand the donor-organ pool for kidney transplantation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa052891

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Remuzzi, G., Cravedi, P., Perna, A., Dimitrov, B. D., Turturro, M., Locatelli, G., Rigotti, P., Baldan, N., Beatini, M., Valente, U., Scalamogna, M., & Ruggenenti, P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-01-26
Volume
354
Issue
4
Pages
343-352
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2048111761
Cited by
518
References
0
FWCI
21.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa052891
The paper
Remuzzi, G., Cravedi, P., Perna, A., Dimitrov, B. D., Turturro, M., Locatelli, G., Rigotti, P., Baldan, N., Beatini, M., Valente, U., Scalamogna, M., & Ruggenenti, P. (2006). Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa052891

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.