The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term survival of kidney grafts from older donors is inferior to that of grafts from younger donors. We sought to determine whether selecting older kidneys according to their histologic characteristics before implantation would positively influence long-term outcome. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we assessed outcomes among 62 patients who received one or two histologically evaluated kidneys from donors older than 60 years of age. These outcomes were compared with outcomes among 248 matched recipients of single kidney grafts that had not been histologically evaluated and were either from donors 60 years of age or younger (124 positive-reference recipients who, according to available data, were expected to have an optimal outcome) or from those older than 60 years (124 negative-reference recipients, expected to have a worse outcome). The primary end point was graft survival. RESULTS: During a median period of 23 months, 4 recipients (6 percent) of histologically evaluated kidneys progressed to dialysis, as compared with 7 positive-reference recipients (6 percent) and 29 negative-reference recipients (23 percent). Graft survival in recipients of histologically evaluated kidneys did not differ significantly from that of grafts in positive-reference recipients but was superior to that of grafts in negative-reference recipients (hazard ratio for graft failure in the negative-reference recipients relative to the recipients of histologically evaluated kidneys, 3.68; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.29 to 10.52; P=0.02). The performance of preimplantation histologic evaluation predicted better survival both in the whole study group (P=0.02) and among recipients of kidneys from older donors (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survival of single or dual kidney grafts from donors older than 60 years of age is excellent, provided that the grafts are evaluated histologically before implantation. This approach may help to expand the donor-organ pool for kidney transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease
Levin, A., Hemmelgarn, B., Culleton, B., Tobe, S., McFarlane, P., Ruzicka, M., Burns, K., Manns, B., White, C., Madore, F., et al. (2008) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.080351 · Cited by 420
Bae, S., Massie, A. B., Thomas, A. G., Bahn, G., Luo, X., Jackson, K. R., Ottmann, S. E., Brennan, D. C., Desai, N. M., Coresh, J., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.14978 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Remuzzi, G., Cravedi, P., Perna, A., Dimitrov, B. D., Turturro, M., Locatelli, G., Rigotti, P., Baldan, N., Beatini, M., Valente, U., Scalamogna, M., & Ruggenenti, P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-352
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2048111761
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa052891
- The paper
- Remuzzi, G., Cravedi, P., Perna, A., Dimitrov, B. D., Turturro, M., Locatelli, G., Rigotti, P., Baldan, N., Beatini, M., Valente, U., Scalamogna, M., & Ruggenenti, P. (2006). Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation from Older Donors. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa052891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.