Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 935

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Five-Gene Signature and Clinical Outcome in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Chen, Hsuan-Yu, Yu, Sung-Liang, Chen, Chun-Houh, Chang, Gee-Chen, Chen, Chih-Yi, Yuan, Ang, Cheng, Chiou-Ling, Wang, Chien-Hsun, Terng, Harn-Jing, Kao, Shu-Fang, Chan, Wing-Kai, Li, Han-Ni, Liu, Chun-Chi, Singh, Sher, Chen, Wei J., Chen, Jeremy J.W., Yang, Pan-Chyr·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current staging methods are inadequate for predicting the outcome of treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We developed a five-gene signature that is closely associated with survival of patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We used computer-generated random numbers to assign 185 frozen specimens for microarray analysis, real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, or both. We studied gene expression in frozen specimens of lung-cancer tissue from 125 randomly selected patients who had undergone surgical resection of NSCLC and evaluated the association between the level of expression and survival. We used risk scores and decision-tree analysis to develop a gene-expression model for the prediction of the outcome of treatment of NSCLC. For validation, we used randomly assigned specimens from 60 other patients. RESULTS: Sixteen genes that correlated with survival among patients with NSCLC were identified by analyzing microarray data and risk scores. We selected five genes (DUSP6, MMD, STAT1, ERBB3, and LCK) for RT-PCR and decision-tree analysis. The five-gene signature was an independent predictor of relapse-free and overall survival. We validated the model with data from an independent cohort of 60 patients with NSCLC and with a set of published microarray data from 86 patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: Our five-gene signature is closely associated with relapse-free and overall survival among patients with NSCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa060096

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 935

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H.-Y., Yu, S.-L., Chen, C.-H., Chang, G.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Yuan, A., Cheng, C.-L., Wang, C.-H., Terng, H.-J., Kao, S.-F., Chan, W.-K., Li, H.-N., Liu, C.-C., Singh, S., Chen, W. J., Chen, J. J. W., & Yang, P.-C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-01-04
Volume
356
Issue
1
Pages
11-20
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2084001490
Cited by
935
References
2
FWCI
46.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Five-Gene Signature and Clinical Outcome in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa060096
The paper
Chen, H.-Y., Yu, S.-L., Chen, C.-H., Chang, G.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Yuan, A., Cheng, C.-L., Wang, C.-H., Terng, H.-J., Kao, S.-F., Chan, W.-K., Li, H.-N., Liu, C.-C., Singh, S., Chen, W. J., Chen, J. J. W., & Yang, P.-C. (2007). A Five-Gene Signature and Clinical Outcome in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa060096

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.